This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Aesthetics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Aesthetics Visual arts This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

removed repetitious linking. 70.150.135.212 20:32, 10 May 2007 (UTC) reply

Can someone who knows about this do something about this article? It reads as if it were written only for someone interested in debating the merits of the concept of 'painterly'. It's informative if you take the time to sort of decipher it, but the writer seems most interested in sharp words and minor description at the expense of working knowledge. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.10.219.114 ( talk) 13:35, 19 November 2009 (UTC) reply