![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
How about the library page? (The people who put the books back on the shelves) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.84.35.213 ( talk) 22:18, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
I changed "...when the aristocrat was boring." to "...when the aristocrat was bored." as I believe that was meant instead. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong :D -- Fëaluinix ( talk) 12:32, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
An interesting section on medieval pages which could be expanded. Total lack of references in this article is a concern, however Monstrelet ( talk) 18:04, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
DONE-- X7C3 ( talk) 15:56, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
I propose that we split off page (assistance occupation) to a separate article, since they are frequently women, not boys, and even if male, are men, considering all the congressional sex scandals, so this article describes a different occupation. Further, pages also exist in businesses, that serve the same duties as those in congress/parliament, such as found in broadcast networks (and the Tonight Show) -- 76.65.128.222 ( talk) 01:07, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's policy on article titles.I don't know what's customary with these discussions, but mine is the only input in over a year, so I don't think it would be TOO BOLD to JUST DO IT! Rags ( talk) 20:28, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
I'm sure there's a "page" in the procession for graduation ceremonies at (some) UK universities - and I think it can be either a boy or a girl. Another argument for this article to be at some other title than "page-boy". Can't find a source - not an easy topic to Google. Pam D 07:02, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
I can't escape a mental image of an outdated ladies' couiffiure. (I know, I should stick to words I can spell --but you get the pic!) There has to be a better title. Rags ( talk) 20:33, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
How about the library page? (The people who put the books back on the shelves) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.84.35.213 ( talk) 22:18, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
I changed "...when the aristocrat was boring." to "...when the aristocrat was bored." as I believe that was meant instead. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong :D -- Fëaluinix ( talk) 12:32, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
An interesting section on medieval pages which could be expanded. Total lack of references in this article is a concern, however Monstrelet ( talk) 18:04, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
DONE-- X7C3 ( talk) 15:56, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
I propose that we split off page (assistance occupation) to a separate article, since they are frequently women, not boys, and even if male, are men, considering all the congressional sex scandals, so this article describes a different occupation. Further, pages also exist in businesses, that serve the same duties as those in congress/parliament, such as found in broadcast networks (and the Tonight Show) -- 76.65.128.222 ( talk) 01:07, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's policy on article titles.I don't know what's customary with these discussions, but mine is the only input in over a year, so I don't think it would be TOO BOLD to JUST DO IT! Rags ( talk) 20:28, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
I'm sure there's a "page" in the procession for graduation ceremonies at (some) UK universities - and I think it can be either a boy or a girl. Another argument for this article to be at some other title than "page-boy". Can't find a source - not an easy topic to Google. Pam D 07:02, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
I can't escape a mental image of an outdated ladies' couiffiure. (I know, I should stick to words I can spell --but you get the pic!) There has to be a better title. Rags ( talk) 20:33, 4 October 2014 (UTC)