This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
Wikipedians in the United States may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
The ruling of the court is not mentioned. Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 02:21, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
I've been trying to add an external link, which keeps getting removed.
Guidelines for external links state the following:
What can normally be linked
3) Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that is relevant to an encyclopedic understanding of the subject and cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues,[2] amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks), or other reasons.
My site, Moral Turpitude, contains additional information relevant to the ruling in Padilla v. Kentucky. Its a large volume of information which is not appropriate for wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mturpitude ( talk • contribs) 19:22, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
Wikipedians in the United States may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
The ruling of the court is not mentioned. Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 02:21, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
I've been trying to add an external link, which keeps getting removed.
Guidelines for external links state the following:
What can normally be linked
3) Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that is relevant to an encyclopedic understanding of the subject and cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues,[2] amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks), or other reasons.
My site, Moral Turpitude, contains additional information relevant to the ruling in Padilla v. Kentucky. Its a large volume of information which is not appropriate for wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mturpitude ( talk • contribs) 19:22, 22 September 2012 (UTC)