GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 16:28, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Will complete this review within a day ☯
Jag
uar ☯
16:28, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Done all of the above comments have been resolved. —
Ssven2
speak 2 me
02:43, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
@
Jaguar: Can you name the references that are missing access dates. I will fix them.
—
Ssven2
speak 2 me
02:46, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Just mainly technical issues, but I like the way the article is written overall. I'll put this on hold for the standard seven days and once they are all addressed we'll take a look. Thanks ☯ Jag uar ☯ 18:19, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for addressing them Ssven, this article now meets the GA criteria. It is broad, well written and well referenced. I don't know what else to say without repeating myself in the last 100 GANs! ☯
Jag
uar ☯
16:39, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 16:28, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Will complete this review within a day ☯
Jag
uar ☯
16:28, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Done all of the above comments have been resolved. —
Ssven2
speak 2 me
02:43, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
@
Jaguar: Can you name the references that are missing access dates. I will fix them.
—
Ssven2
speak 2 me
02:46, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Just mainly technical issues, but I like the way the article is written overall. I'll put this on hold for the standard seven days and once they are all addressed we'll take a look. Thanks ☯ Jag uar ☯ 18:19, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for addressing them Ssven, this article now meets the GA criteria. It is broad, well written and well referenced. I don't know what else to say without repeating myself in the last 100 GANs! ☯
Jag
uar ☯
16:39, 9 January 2015 (UTC)