This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Automobiles Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Brands This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is SHOUTING at me... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.129.238.211 ( talk) 01:33, 31 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Winner 42 ( talk) 00:04, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply

This cars are very well documented. I roughly checked the specifications of this car (in general, they look right), and the informations in this article and found them correct. Production figure is right, too. So I added my sources and some interesting links in the article and some external links. Further I removed the "citations needed" template, hoping that is correct. -- Chief tin cloud ( talk) 10:42, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply

While I don't know the mechanical parts situation with Studebakers, I usually get needed parts for Packard-built 1955-1956 models without problems. -- Chief tin cloud ( talk) 10:48, 21 March 2011 (UTC) reply

What does "1953-53-style " mean? Kdammers ( talk) 11:17, 4 June 2011 (UTC) reply