PSLV-C42 has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: November 24, 2018. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A fact from PSLV-C42 appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 7 January 2019 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Hawkeye7 ( talk · contribs) 18:59, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
I'll pick this one up. Review follows shortly. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:59, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Looks good.
Hello!
I am late to the party, but having reviewed the page, I have a suggestion.
It is well-written, as far as it goes, but it also reads like an information dump, which makes it somewhat inaccessible to the casual reader. I suggest writing a "History" or "Background" section explaining why the satellite was developed. I've done something like this on my Solrad 1 page (and also its parent, Solrad).
Keep up the good work!
-- Neopeius ( talk) 21:14, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 18:29, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
PSLV-C42 has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: November 24, 2018. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A fact from PSLV-C42 appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 7 January 2019 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Hawkeye7 ( talk · contribs) 18:59, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
I'll pick this one up. Review follows shortly. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:59, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Looks good.
Hello!
I am late to the party, but having reviewed the page, I have a suggestion.
It is well-written, as far as it goes, but it also reads like an information dump, which makes it somewhat inaccessible to the casual reader. I suggest writing a "History" or "Background" section explaining why the satellite was developed. I've done something like this on my Solrad 1 page (and also its parent, Solrad).
Keep up the good work!
-- Neopeius ( talk) 21:14, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 18:29, 20 August 2019 (UTC)