![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Indeed, the statement (i.e., its logic) is strange. The source must be found and understood. (I did write this text, but I have no slightest recollection.) -M.Altenmann >t 05:10, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Here is the text, from the introduction in the book:
I.e., the text refers to the Soviet "Regulations about the POW". However the subsequent phrasing "not to say about the norms of the international law" makes me think that the author has vague notions of this law, i.e. the Geneva Conventions (or, a smartass interpretation of the phrase "Members of the armed forces of a Party to the conflict": since the war was not declared, there was no conflict and hence no Party thereto, right?). -M.Altenmann >t 06:12, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
References
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Indeed, the statement (i.e., its logic) is strange. The source must be found and understood. (I did write this text, but I have no slightest recollection.) -M.Altenmann >t 05:10, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Here is the text, from the introduction in the book:
I.e., the text refers to the Soviet "Regulations about the POW". However the subsequent phrasing "not to say about the norms of the international law" makes me think that the author has vague notions of this law, i.e. the Geneva Conventions (or, a smartass interpretation of the phrase "Members of the armed forces of a Party to the conflict": since the war was not declared, there was no conflict and hence no Party thereto, right?). -M.Altenmann >t 06:12, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
References