This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
P. Chidambaram article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
In January, the whole controversy section was deleted by User:25_Cents_FC and earlier some of that stuff was already removed. I'm not sure what the reason for this was, some of these allegations relate to Chidambaram and are sourced by newspapers. -- Calypsomusic ( talk) 16:27, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
In September 2011, Subramanian Swamy moved to Supreme Court of India, after months of request to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to look into Chidambaram's role in the 2G spectrum scam. [1] [2] [3] After having not had any favourable response from the Prime Minister he approached the Supreme Court and based on the fair credibility of preliminary evidence and documents, the court agreed to take up the petition. [4] Andimuthu Raja, the prime accused in the 2G spectrum scam, also revealed on tapped phones that Chidambaram received a lot of money for 2G spectrum allocation. [5]
In the same case an office memorandum from the office of the Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee was submitted to the Supreme Court which stated that Chidambaram collaborated in the under-pricing in the 2G spectrum scam during his tenure as Finance Minister. The memorandum said that if Chidambaram wanted, the 2G spectrum could have been auctioned. [6] [7] On 2 February 2012, Supreme court left it to the special CBI sessions court to decide on whether to make Chidambaram a co-accused in the case or order a CBI enquiry. [1] [8] On 4 February 2012, the special CBI court dismissed [9] The CBI court accepted Swamy's two allegations that Chidambaram and A Raja took decision jointly on fixing the price of the spectrum and offloading of shares. However, it dismissed the plea saying there were lack of evidences on Chidambaram's criminal intention behind these two acts. Swamy appealed against this order directly in the Supreme court but the plea was again rejected by Supreme Court of India and thereby giving a clean chit to Chidambaram. [10]
In a press statement on 26 April 2012, Swamy alleged that Advantage Strategic Consulting, a company which is owned by Chidambaram's son Karti Chidambaram, received a 5% stake in mobile operator Aircel, as a condition for the 2006 Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) approval of Malaysian company Maxis Communications's investment in Aircel. [11] Even though shareholding in a large publicly listed company is easily verifiable, no evidence was produced to substantiate charges of Karti owning shares in any Maxis companies. Chidambaram then had statutory authority over the FIPB in his role as the Finance Minister. Subsequently the issue was raised on multiple times in Parliament of India by the opposition which demanded his resignation. [12] He and the government denied all the allegations. [13] However, according to The Pioneer and India Today reports, documents show that approval to the foreign direct investment (FDI) proposal was indeed delayed by about 7 months by P Chidambaram. [14] [15] [16]
Income Tax Matter In November 2005, ADMK in Tamil Nadu raised the matter of P. Chidambaram's wife, Mrs. Nalini Chidambaram, as Senior Advocate and Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department, had argued and lost a case on behalf of the Income Tax Department vs. Janakiram Mills & Others. ADMK wrongly charged Mrs. Chidambaram of favouring Sree Karpagambal Mills Ltd., a textile mill owned by Mr. P. Chidambaram's brother. It was later established that Sree Karpagambal Mills was not party to the case. Opposition parties disrupted the Lok Sabha for a day demanding an explanation from Mr P Chidambaram. Mrs. Nalini Chidambaram returned the fees of Rs 100,000 she had received from the Income Tax Department for arguing this case.
He represented the bankrupt American energy giant Enron, as a senior lawyer in India, and is again set to revive its Dhabol power project. [17] [18]
Chidambaram also represented the controversial British mining conglomerate Vedanta Resources in the Mumbai High Court until 2003 when he became the Finance minister of India. He was also a member of the board of directors of that company. [19]
He resigned on 10 July 1992 from the Minister position owning moral responsibility for investing in Fairgrowth by his wife, a company allegedly involved in securities scam. His apparent deep links in the scam was never thoroughly investigated. [20]
In 1997, he announced a controversial Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme (VDIS) which granted income-tax defaulters indefinite immunity from prosecution under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, and the Companies Act, 1956 in exchange for self-valuation and disclosure of income and assets. [21] [22] The Comptroller and Auditor General of India condemned the scheme in his report as abusive and a fraud on the genuine taxpayers of the country. [23]
In August 2006, President A.P.J. Abdul Kalam gave permission to enquire into the allegations that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and his Finance Minister P. Chidambaram had been holding office of profit at the time of elections. It has been alleged that they both had been the board members of Rajiv Gandhi Trust Foundation. The Election Commission has been authorised to enquire into the allegations. [24]
On 7 April 2009, P. Chidambaram was shoed by Jarnail Singh, a Sikh journalist during a press conference in Delhi. Singh, who works at the Hindi daily Dainik Jagaran was dissatisfied with Chidamabaram's answer to a question on the Central Bureau of Investigation's (CBI) clean chit to Congress leader Jagdish Tytler on the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case. [25] Later, Jarnail Singh appeared on a few media channels and thanked Chidambaram for taking no action against him and said that he would apologise to Chidambaram if he got a chance to meet him personally. [26] He also said that his method of protest was wrong, but the issue was right. [27] [28] He also declined to take money offered to him by the Shiromani Akali Dal, a Sikh political party.
Mr. Chidambaram has been in public conflict with other members of the UPA government on policy issues. [29] There have been several instances where his public positions have exposed confusion in the policy agenda of the UPA government. [30] In the past he has regularly announced plans to end Naxalism in the impending future. The most recent announcement was on 30 Jul 2010. [31] Another previous such declaration was on 10 November 2009. [32]
In 2009, Parliamentary elections, it was alleged in 'The Hindu' that Chidambaram has pressurised the Returning Officer of Sivaganga and doctored the poll results in his favour. All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam candidate Kannappan who lost in the poll demanded recounting of votes, which was declined. [33]
Chidambaram was criticised widely for ordering a police lathi charge at midnight on non-violent protesters at the Ramlila Maidan, Delhi. The protesters led by Baba Ramdev were protesting against widespread corruption in governance and demanding bringing back of black money to India stashed abroad in foreign banks. [34]
It is also alleged that Chidambaram planned Anna Hazare's arrest to lodge him in Tihar Jail during the recent Anti- Corruption Campaign in India, which sparked off mass protests all over India. [35]
Chidambaram's effectiveness as the Minister of Home Affairs has been questioned on various occasions. Upon taking office, he promised to tackle left-wing Naxalite-Maoist insurgency. However, there has been no progress in preventing Maoist attacks in India. Chidambaram has been accused of callously sacrificing ill-equipped and unprepared Central Reserve Police Force jawans repeatedly. On 6 April 2010 76 CRPF jawans were massacred in Dantewada. [36] Besides condemning the attack, Chidambaram's ministry has made no progress in prosecuting the killers.
In 2010, there were several major attacks by Maoists including a 28 May 2010 train derailment that killed over 150 civilians, a 29 June attack that killed 26 policemen and dozens of other attacks that killed scores of security forces and civilians. Maoist attacks have continued in 2011, including the dismemberment of 10 police officials in Chhatisgarh state.
The RTI Act by advocate and activist Vivek Garg said that Chidambaram had been tasked to "supervise and deal with all financial matters" by a Group of Ministers in the run-up to the games.Documents accessed from PMO reveal that Chidambaram, the then FM, had been tasked with supervising all money matters pertaining to CWG which leads to a loss of 23.42 billion. [37]
Chidambaram was criticised for his ministry's failure to prevent the 13 July 2011 Mumbai bombings, in spite of massive investments in security following the 2008 Mumbai attacks. Three years after the 2008 attacks, security preparations were proven to be inadequate with channel breakdown and failures in modernising, procuring and installing security equipment. [38] Chidambaram defended the agencies under his ministry against the charge of intelligence failure with the response:
Having no intelligence in this case, however, does not mean that there was a failure on part of the intelligence agencies. [39]
There has been no intelligence failure. There was no intelligence warning about 13/7. [40]
Chidambaram has been accused of hoarding black money abroad [41] [42] and several petitioners have challenged Chidambaram in the open media and in several noted columns to file a defamation case against them if the allegations were untrue. [21] Chidambaram has not responded to this.
References
{{
cite news}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help); Text "Government on guard as Opposition armed with over a dozen issues" ignored (
help)
I also noticed that he seems to be a friend of Arjuna Mahendran and seems to have also played a crucial role in Central Bank of Sri Lanka bond scandal too. Now he is given bail. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/congress-p-chidambaram-released-on-bail-tihar-jail-1625164-2019-12-04
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-50655126 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.157.53.101 ( talk) 17:11, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
P. Chidambaram article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
In January, the whole controversy section was deleted by User:25_Cents_FC and earlier some of that stuff was already removed. I'm not sure what the reason for this was, some of these allegations relate to Chidambaram and are sourced by newspapers. -- Calypsomusic ( talk) 16:27, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
In September 2011, Subramanian Swamy moved to Supreme Court of India, after months of request to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to look into Chidambaram's role in the 2G spectrum scam. [1] [2] [3] After having not had any favourable response from the Prime Minister he approached the Supreme Court and based on the fair credibility of preliminary evidence and documents, the court agreed to take up the petition. [4] Andimuthu Raja, the prime accused in the 2G spectrum scam, also revealed on tapped phones that Chidambaram received a lot of money for 2G spectrum allocation. [5]
In the same case an office memorandum from the office of the Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee was submitted to the Supreme Court which stated that Chidambaram collaborated in the under-pricing in the 2G spectrum scam during his tenure as Finance Minister. The memorandum said that if Chidambaram wanted, the 2G spectrum could have been auctioned. [6] [7] On 2 February 2012, Supreme court left it to the special CBI sessions court to decide on whether to make Chidambaram a co-accused in the case or order a CBI enquiry. [1] [8] On 4 February 2012, the special CBI court dismissed [9] The CBI court accepted Swamy's two allegations that Chidambaram and A Raja took decision jointly on fixing the price of the spectrum and offloading of shares. However, it dismissed the plea saying there were lack of evidences on Chidambaram's criminal intention behind these two acts. Swamy appealed against this order directly in the Supreme court but the plea was again rejected by Supreme Court of India and thereby giving a clean chit to Chidambaram. [10]
In a press statement on 26 April 2012, Swamy alleged that Advantage Strategic Consulting, a company which is owned by Chidambaram's son Karti Chidambaram, received a 5% stake in mobile operator Aircel, as a condition for the 2006 Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) approval of Malaysian company Maxis Communications's investment in Aircel. [11] Even though shareholding in a large publicly listed company is easily verifiable, no evidence was produced to substantiate charges of Karti owning shares in any Maxis companies. Chidambaram then had statutory authority over the FIPB in his role as the Finance Minister. Subsequently the issue was raised on multiple times in Parliament of India by the opposition which demanded his resignation. [12] He and the government denied all the allegations. [13] However, according to The Pioneer and India Today reports, documents show that approval to the foreign direct investment (FDI) proposal was indeed delayed by about 7 months by P Chidambaram. [14] [15] [16]
Income Tax Matter In November 2005, ADMK in Tamil Nadu raised the matter of P. Chidambaram's wife, Mrs. Nalini Chidambaram, as Senior Advocate and Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department, had argued and lost a case on behalf of the Income Tax Department vs. Janakiram Mills & Others. ADMK wrongly charged Mrs. Chidambaram of favouring Sree Karpagambal Mills Ltd., a textile mill owned by Mr. P. Chidambaram's brother. It was later established that Sree Karpagambal Mills was not party to the case. Opposition parties disrupted the Lok Sabha for a day demanding an explanation from Mr P Chidambaram. Mrs. Nalini Chidambaram returned the fees of Rs 100,000 she had received from the Income Tax Department for arguing this case.
He represented the bankrupt American energy giant Enron, as a senior lawyer in India, and is again set to revive its Dhabol power project. [17] [18]
Chidambaram also represented the controversial British mining conglomerate Vedanta Resources in the Mumbai High Court until 2003 when he became the Finance minister of India. He was also a member of the board of directors of that company. [19]
He resigned on 10 July 1992 from the Minister position owning moral responsibility for investing in Fairgrowth by his wife, a company allegedly involved in securities scam. His apparent deep links in the scam was never thoroughly investigated. [20]
In 1997, he announced a controversial Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme (VDIS) which granted income-tax defaulters indefinite immunity from prosecution under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, and the Companies Act, 1956 in exchange for self-valuation and disclosure of income and assets. [21] [22] The Comptroller and Auditor General of India condemned the scheme in his report as abusive and a fraud on the genuine taxpayers of the country. [23]
In August 2006, President A.P.J. Abdul Kalam gave permission to enquire into the allegations that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and his Finance Minister P. Chidambaram had been holding office of profit at the time of elections. It has been alleged that they both had been the board members of Rajiv Gandhi Trust Foundation. The Election Commission has been authorised to enquire into the allegations. [24]
On 7 April 2009, P. Chidambaram was shoed by Jarnail Singh, a Sikh journalist during a press conference in Delhi. Singh, who works at the Hindi daily Dainik Jagaran was dissatisfied with Chidamabaram's answer to a question on the Central Bureau of Investigation's (CBI) clean chit to Congress leader Jagdish Tytler on the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case. [25] Later, Jarnail Singh appeared on a few media channels and thanked Chidambaram for taking no action against him and said that he would apologise to Chidambaram if he got a chance to meet him personally. [26] He also said that his method of protest was wrong, but the issue was right. [27] [28] He also declined to take money offered to him by the Shiromani Akali Dal, a Sikh political party.
Mr. Chidambaram has been in public conflict with other members of the UPA government on policy issues. [29] There have been several instances where his public positions have exposed confusion in the policy agenda of the UPA government. [30] In the past he has regularly announced plans to end Naxalism in the impending future. The most recent announcement was on 30 Jul 2010. [31] Another previous such declaration was on 10 November 2009. [32]
In 2009, Parliamentary elections, it was alleged in 'The Hindu' that Chidambaram has pressurised the Returning Officer of Sivaganga and doctored the poll results in his favour. All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam candidate Kannappan who lost in the poll demanded recounting of votes, which was declined. [33]
Chidambaram was criticised widely for ordering a police lathi charge at midnight on non-violent protesters at the Ramlila Maidan, Delhi. The protesters led by Baba Ramdev were protesting against widespread corruption in governance and demanding bringing back of black money to India stashed abroad in foreign banks. [34]
It is also alleged that Chidambaram planned Anna Hazare's arrest to lodge him in Tihar Jail during the recent Anti- Corruption Campaign in India, which sparked off mass protests all over India. [35]
Chidambaram's effectiveness as the Minister of Home Affairs has been questioned on various occasions. Upon taking office, he promised to tackle left-wing Naxalite-Maoist insurgency. However, there has been no progress in preventing Maoist attacks in India. Chidambaram has been accused of callously sacrificing ill-equipped and unprepared Central Reserve Police Force jawans repeatedly. On 6 April 2010 76 CRPF jawans were massacred in Dantewada. [36] Besides condemning the attack, Chidambaram's ministry has made no progress in prosecuting the killers.
In 2010, there were several major attacks by Maoists including a 28 May 2010 train derailment that killed over 150 civilians, a 29 June attack that killed 26 policemen and dozens of other attacks that killed scores of security forces and civilians. Maoist attacks have continued in 2011, including the dismemberment of 10 police officials in Chhatisgarh state.
The RTI Act by advocate and activist Vivek Garg said that Chidambaram had been tasked to "supervise and deal with all financial matters" by a Group of Ministers in the run-up to the games.Documents accessed from PMO reveal that Chidambaram, the then FM, had been tasked with supervising all money matters pertaining to CWG which leads to a loss of 23.42 billion. [37]
Chidambaram was criticised for his ministry's failure to prevent the 13 July 2011 Mumbai bombings, in spite of massive investments in security following the 2008 Mumbai attacks. Three years after the 2008 attacks, security preparations were proven to be inadequate with channel breakdown and failures in modernising, procuring and installing security equipment. [38] Chidambaram defended the agencies under his ministry against the charge of intelligence failure with the response:
Having no intelligence in this case, however, does not mean that there was a failure on part of the intelligence agencies. [39]
There has been no intelligence failure. There was no intelligence warning about 13/7. [40]
Chidambaram has been accused of hoarding black money abroad [41] [42] and several petitioners have challenged Chidambaram in the open media and in several noted columns to file a defamation case against them if the allegations were untrue. [21] Chidambaram has not responded to this.
References
{{
cite news}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite news}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help); Text "Government on guard as Opposition armed with over a dozen issues" ignored (
help)
I also noticed that he seems to be a friend of Arjuna Mahendran and seems to have also played a crucial role in Central Bank of Sri Lanka bond scandal too. Now he is given bail. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/congress-p-chidambaram-released-on-bail-tihar-jail-1625164-2019-12-04
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-50655126 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.157.53.101 ( talk) 17:11, 4 December 2019 (UTC)