This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. See also:
WikiProject Trains to do list and the
Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
I've tweaked the coords to match the gridref location. Two other points which I noticed - has it really been decided that the station will have two platforms? Also, if I'm right in thinking that the
Buckinghamshire Junction Railway curved off slightly to the north of the site, would Oxford Road Halt have had through services to Yarnton?
Lamberhurst (
talk)
07:30, 8 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Regarding platforms - unless the line is doubled as part of the Bicester curve plan, I suggest that W.E.P. will have just one platform. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
11:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Regarding the junction - I've expanded
Oxford Road Halt railway station, which should help. It has been saidwhere?who? that Mitchell & Smith may not be 100% reliable, but I do find them better than Simpson; and they do provide a reproduction of a 1914 map in "Oxford to Bletchley", fig. VI and a 1936 map as fig. VII in the same book - this should clear up the matter. They show that the junction mentioned above - named Oxford Road Junction on the maps - was immediately to the south-west of Oxford Road Crossing, which was itself immediately to the south-west of Oxford Road Halt. The point of divergence was still further south-west. Similar, but later, maps are also in "Oxford to Moreton-in-Marsh", fig. V (1922) and in "Didcot to Banbury", fig. XIII (1947), but these are cropped close to the point in question. I believe that a direct service between Oxford Road Halt and Yarnton was feasible, but cannot find any evidence for one: any doubt ought to be discussed at
Talk:Oxford Road Halt railway station. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
11:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)reply
A relevant copy of Bradbury would be useful; no doubt Bill Simpson would know. Interestingly, the photo added to this page seems to match up with an older image featuring on p. 47 of the first volume of Simpson's Oxford/Cambridge work. It shows a grain silo (which still appears to be extant) together with the "hut of an old LNWR weighing machine office" which stood on the gravel area adjacent to the track. Also in the vicinity were the offices of Amey served by a siding. Would be interesting to know whether the crossing keeper's house at Water Eaton Crossing just to the north still exists.
Lamberhurst (
talk)
21:14, 8 September 2009 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. See also:
WikiProject Trains to do list and the
Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
I've tweaked the coords to match the gridref location. Two other points which I noticed - has it really been decided that the station will have two platforms? Also, if I'm right in thinking that the
Buckinghamshire Junction Railway curved off slightly to the north of the site, would Oxford Road Halt have had through services to Yarnton?
Lamberhurst (
talk)
07:30, 8 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Regarding platforms - unless the line is doubled as part of the Bicester curve plan, I suggest that W.E.P. will have just one platform. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
11:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Regarding the junction - I've expanded
Oxford Road Halt railway station, which should help. It has been saidwhere?who? that Mitchell & Smith may not be 100% reliable, but I do find them better than Simpson; and they do provide a reproduction of a 1914 map in "Oxford to Bletchley", fig. VI and a 1936 map as fig. VII in the same book - this should clear up the matter. They show that the junction mentioned above - named Oxford Road Junction on the maps - was immediately to the south-west of Oxford Road Crossing, which was itself immediately to the south-west of Oxford Road Halt. The point of divergence was still further south-west. Similar, but later, maps are also in "Oxford to Moreton-in-Marsh", fig. V (1922) and in "Didcot to Banbury", fig. XIII (1947), but these are cropped close to the point in question. I believe that a direct service between Oxford Road Halt and Yarnton was feasible, but cannot find any evidence for one: any doubt ought to be discussed at
Talk:Oxford Road Halt railway station. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
11:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)reply
A relevant copy of Bradbury would be useful; no doubt Bill Simpson would know. Interestingly, the photo added to this page seems to match up with an older image featuring on p. 47 of the first volume of Simpson's Oxford/Cambridge work. It shows a grain silo (which still appears to be extant) together with the "hut of an old LNWR weighing machine office" which stood on the gravel area adjacent to the track. Also in the vicinity were the offices of Amey served by a siding. Would be interesting to know whether the crossing keeper's house at Water Eaton Crossing just to the north still exists.
Lamberhurst (
talk)
21:14, 8 September 2009 (UTC)reply