This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted on 17 November 2012 by reviewer Odie5533 ( talk · contribs).

History suggests Mgc5256 may have a conflict of interest. Removing the spam section was particularly suspicious. 2620:0:1000:1601:48EC:9A93:5902:46A5 ( talk) 02:42, 2 February 2017 (UTC) reply

You do realize that Twitter is not a legitimate source, right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgc5256 ( talk • contribs) 04:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC) reply

On the contrary, Wikipedia policy is that "A specific tweet may be useful as a self-published, primary source." See Twitter as a reliable source. The claim is that the company has been accused of spam on Twitter, and the links are to specific, concrete, documented allegations of spam on Twitter. 2620:0:1000:1601:48EC:9A93:5902:46A5 ( talk) 04:17, 2 February 2017 (UTC) reply