Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TheSpecialUser ( talk · contribs) 04:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC) Will finish in short time.  —  TheSpecialUser ^{( TSU)} 04:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC) reply

Sorry but this has to be a quick fail. Here is an overview of the problems;

• Lead - it is in a bad condition and needs expansion to summarize the article.
• Refs - they are BARE (not completely filled) as well as few of them are unreliable and few are dead
• Due to lack of ref-standard, I doubt the content as misleading info can also be present. This is just a thought and not a reason to quick fail
• Few claims still require reliable sources as they are completely unsourced.
• Copyediting - The article is not upto the standards of GA and need copyediting from someone experienced

This was a premature nom and the article isn't near to a GA. I'll start my work on the article now. —  TheSpecialUser ^{( TSU)} 06:26, 14 July 2012 (UTC) reply