Talk:Overlapping spreading centers is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use
geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oceans, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
oceans,
seas, and
bays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OceansWikipedia:WikiProject OceansTemplate:WikiProject OceansOceans articles
Other : add ISBNs and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from
Aral Sea; check
La Belle (ship) for GA status; improve citations or footnotes and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from
MS Estonia
Hi, Bruce. Yes, he is an admin, but many other editors, like me, also 'review' new pages. It's just a routine way of checking and flagging up that there's nothing on a new page that could be of concern (copyright vio/promotional material or other inappropriate content). It's most important for new pages going into 'mainspace' i.e. the proper part of the encyclopaedia. We call it Page Curation or
New Page Patrol. You will shortly receive a similar message for the
Ross Embayment page - it may or may not contain comments/advice from that reviewer (like a lead sentence is needed etc.) I could do it myself, but that might be perceived as a conflict of interest. I should add that
DESiegel was absolutely right to point out I shouldn't have allowed our conversations to be carried out on the RE sandbox page itself if it were to go directly into mainspace. My apologies for that -totally my fault. In future we'll stick to the talk pages, assuming that you'd still like me to continue supporting your editing work - that's very much a decision for you, of course. Regards,
Nick Moyes (
talk)
22:27, 19 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Hi Nick. I find the talk pages a bit confusing as there are several on my User page and Sandbox. But, let's keep it up. I addressed an admin comment on the OSC page = added wlink in the Macdonald page. Do I delete the comment or will that be patrolled and deleted?
BrucePL (
talk)
15:16, 21 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Talk:Overlapping spreading centers is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use
geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oceans, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
oceans,
seas, and
bays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OceansWikipedia:WikiProject OceansTemplate:WikiProject OceansOceans articles
Other : add ISBNs and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from
Aral Sea; check
La Belle (ship) for GA status; improve citations or footnotes and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from
MS Estonia
Hi, Bruce. Yes, he is an admin, but many other editors, like me, also 'review' new pages. It's just a routine way of checking and flagging up that there's nothing on a new page that could be of concern (copyright vio/promotional material or other inappropriate content). It's most important for new pages going into 'mainspace' i.e. the proper part of the encyclopaedia. We call it Page Curation or
New Page Patrol. You will shortly receive a similar message for the
Ross Embayment page - it may or may not contain comments/advice from that reviewer (like a lead sentence is needed etc.) I could do it myself, but that might be perceived as a conflict of interest. I should add that
DESiegel was absolutely right to point out I shouldn't have allowed our conversations to be carried out on the RE sandbox page itself if it were to go directly into mainspace. My apologies for that -totally my fault. In future we'll stick to the talk pages, assuming that you'd still like me to continue supporting your editing work - that's very much a decision for you, of course. Regards,
Nick Moyes (
talk)
22:27, 19 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Hi Nick. I find the talk pages a bit confusing as there are several on my User page and Sandbox. But, let's keep it up. I addressed an admin comment on the OSC page = added wlink in the Macdonald page. Do I delete the comment or will that be patrolled and deleted?
BrucePL (
talk)
15:16, 21 March 2018 (UTC)reply