From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1


DYK nomination

I'd like to see this article nominated to appear on the main page as part of did you know. I'm just wondering what everyone elses thoughts on what might be a good hook? Some ideas include:

Thoughts? I personally prefer the third. I couldn't really think of a hook that includes the fact that it will be the steepest wooden roller coaster as well as the inversion statistic. Themeparkgc   Talk  00:13, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

I personally like the first. It seems to catch me better than the other. I think the of it's type might make it a little confusing for some readers.-- Astros4477 ( talk) 03:21, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
How about:
? Themeparkgc   Talk  07:32, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
That sounds good.-- Astros4477 ( talk) 10:04, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
I think the first one sounds the best.-- Dom497 ( talk) 12:01, 12 August 2012 (UTC)


Still more expansion to do

Even though I have completed a huge expansion of the article from its original stub state, there are still a few items the article is missing. Namely a section on the theme of the ride (which could fit under Characteristics) and some information about the construction of the ride (which could fit under the History section). If anyone wants to tackle either of these feel free. If not I'll add them in the coming days. Themeparkgc   Talk  00:32, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1


DYK nomination

I'd like to see this article nominated to appear on the main page as part of did you know. I'm just wondering what everyone elses thoughts on what might be a good hook? Some ideas include:

Thoughts? I personally prefer the third. I couldn't really think of a hook that includes the fact that it will be the steepest wooden roller coaster as well as the inversion statistic. Themeparkgc   Talk  00:13, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

I personally like the first. It seems to catch me better than the other. I think the of it's type might make it a little confusing for some readers.-- Astros4477 ( talk) 03:21, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
How about:
? Themeparkgc   Talk  07:32, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
That sounds good.-- Astros4477 ( talk) 10:04, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
I think the first one sounds the best.-- Dom497 ( talk) 12:01, 12 August 2012 (UTC)


Still more expansion to do

Even though I have completed a huge expansion of the article from its original stub state, there are still a few items the article is missing. Namely a section on the theme of the ride (which could fit under Characteristics) and some information about the construction of the ride (which could fit under the History section). If anyone wants to tackle either of these feel free. If not I'll add them in the coming days. Themeparkgc   Talk  00:32, 10 August 2012 (UTC)


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook