![]() | Osteonecrosis of the jaw was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Osteonecrosis of the jaw.
|
This is a great article, but is deficient in one aspect - osteoradionecrosis, which is still the most common form of osteonecrosis of the jaws. Also, no mention of hyperbaric oxygen therapy, which is used to treat this form of osteonecrosis (not bisphosphonate induced). I'll try and get something done. Dr-G - Illigetimi nil carborundum est. 00:53, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
User:Dr. Imbeau well done on creating such a full and well cited article. I've had a brief copyedit over the article:
The article is very detailed and needs a more general tweak of style:
So really great start to an article on a topic I knew little about. I will try reading it more deeply when I have a chance (vs very quickly and with view of copyedit & initial wikifying). It will need some adjustment of tone/writing style for the wider wikipedia non-specialist readership (perhaps greater division of those long paragraphs, or use of subheadings?). David Ruben Talk 13:58, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
I judged this article on the following 7 criteria:
Congratulations, it passes! I had to think a long time before passing this article, because it's obviously written by a medical professional (the Dr. in your username is a bit of a tip-off), and the subject matter is such that it is incredibly hard for a lay reader to understand. In the end though, I decided to pass it, because every single medical term is wikilinked, the lead is absolutely brilliant in explaining what's going on to anyone, and frankly, you can't describe this subject without using a lot of medical terms. Like I said though, the lead explains anything a lay reader would want to know, and the article itself is great, not to mention incredibly well-referenced. I'd suggest pushing this article to FAC if you want/have time, but there will probably be a fight about the reading level. Once again, congratulations on a great article! -- PresN 17:05, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Having followed the development of this article about a condition I had never previously heard of, two items worthy of mention that will (or at least should) increase awareness.
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)This is an excellent article, and I hope it will become featured in the future... however my concern lies with the use of jargon, and the obvious writing from the specialist perspective... For example mentioning "the literature" in the first paragraph, aetiology (instead of causes), histopathology (microscopic changes might be better, with a link to pathology perhaps in the first sentence of the paragraph?), and so on. Just a hint.-- Steven Fruitsmaak ( Reply) 12:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
This systematic review of the 93 published cases doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.01.047 shows that the majority of cases had undergone dental work and most of them were on other medications interfering with bone turnover. This ought to be cited. JFW | T@lk 11:04, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
This "lay description was added on 1st December. The lead-in is meant to be the simple introduction, and then each section start simply and get into greater detail. I've removed it for now and post it below for further consideration (at the very least, article space edits are not signed) David Ruben Talk 14:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
{{
cite journal}}
: Text "Pages 1166 - 1172" ignored (
help); Text "Volume 9, Issue 12" ignored (
help); Text "doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70305-X" ignored (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)No mention is made of ORN or its treatment with HBOT. Here are a couple refs.
Pitak-Arnnop P, Sader R, Dhanuthai K; et al. (2008). "Management of osteoradionecrosis of the jaws: an analysis of evidence". Eur J Surg Oncol. 34 (10): 1123–34.
doi:
10.1016/j.ejso.2008.03.014.
PMID
18455907. {{
cite journal}}
: Explicit use of et al. in: |author=
(
help); Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)
Gerlach NL, Barkhuysen R, Kaanders JH, Janssens GO, Sterk W, Merkx MA (2008). "The effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on quality of life in oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with radiotherapy". Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 37 (3): 255–9.
doi:
10.1016/j.ijom.2007.11.013.
PMID
18262761. {{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)
-- Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 04:25, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Do not believe this article meets GA as it is to narrow in scope. Does not cover radiation induced osteo necrosis and its treatment.-- Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 00:37, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
"Fossy jaw" redirects here, but there's a separate article on Phossy jaw. I'd fix this myself, but I frankly have no idea how to do so ... maybe I need a user account to do so 88.112.12.243 ( talk) 09:30, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
2011 paper: doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05929.x JFW | T@lk 22:21, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
![]() | Osteonecrosis of the jaw was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Osteonecrosis of the jaw.
|
This is a great article, but is deficient in one aspect - osteoradionecrosis, which is still the most common form of osteonecrosis of the jaws. Also, no mention of hyperbaric oxygen therapy, which is used to treat this form of osteonecrosis (not bisphosphonate induced). I'll try and get something done. Dr-G - Illigetimi nil carborundum est. 00:53, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
User:Dr. Imbeau well done on creating such a full and well cited article. I've had a brief copyedit over the article:
The article is very detailed and needs a more general tweak of style:
So really great start to an article on a topic I knew little about. I will try reading it more deeply when I have a chance (vs very quickly and with view of copyedit & initial wikifying). It will need some adjustment of tone/writing style for the wider wikipedia non-specialist readership (perhaps greater division of those long paragraphs, or use of subheadings?). David Ruben Talk 13:58, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
I judged this article on the following 7 criteria:
Congratulations, it passes! I had to think a long time before passing this article, because it's obviously written by a medical professional (the Dr. in your username is a bit of a tip-off), and the subject matter is such that it is incredibly hard for a lay reader to understand. In the end though, I decided to pass it, because every single medical term is wikilinked, the lead is absolutely brilliant in explaining what's going on to anyone, and frankly, you can't describe this subject without using a lot of medical terms. Like I said though, the lead explains anything a lay reader would want to know, and the article itself is great, not to mention incredibly well-referenced. I'd suggest pushing this article to FAC if you want/have time, but there will probably be a fight about the reading level. Once again, congratulations on a great article! -- PresN 17:05, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Having followed the development of this article about a condition I had never previously heard of, two items worthy of mention that will (or at least should) increase awareness.
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)This is an excellent article, and I hope it will become featured in the future... however my concern lies with the use of jargon, and the obvious writing from the specialist perspective... For example mentioning "the literature" in the first paragraph, aetiology (instead of causes), histopathology (microscopic changes might be better, with a link to pathology perhaps in the first sentence of the paragraph?), and so on. Just a hint.-- Steven Fruitsmaak ( Reply) 12:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
This systematic review of the 93 published cases doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.01.047 shows that the majority of cases had undergone dental work and most of them were on other medications interfering with bone turnover. This ought to be cited. JFW | T@lk 11:04, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
This "lay description was added on 1st December. The lead-in is meant to be the simple introduction, and then each section start simply and get into greater detail. I've removed it for now and post it below for further consideration (at the very least, article space edits are not signed) David Ruben Talk 14:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
{{
cite journal}}
: Text "Pages 1166 - 1172" ignored (
help); Text "Volume 9, Issue 12" ignored (
help); Text "doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70305-X" ignored (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)No mention is made of ORN or its treatment with HBOT. Here are a couple refs.
Pitak-Arnnop P, Sader R, Dhanuthai K; et al. (2008). "Management of osteoradionecrosis of the jaws: an analysis of evidence". Eur J Surg Oncol. 34 (10): 1123–34.
doi:
10.1016/j.ejso.2008.03.014.
PMID
18455907. {{
cite journal}}
: Explicit use of et al. in: |author=
(
help); Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)
Gerlach NL, Barkhuysen R, Kaanders JH, Janssens GO, Sterk W, Merkx MA (2008). "The effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on quality of life in oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with radiotherapy". Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 37 (3): 255–9.
doi:
10.1016/j.ijom.2007.11.013.
PMID
18262761. {{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |month=
ignored (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)
-- Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 04:25, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Do not believe this article meets GA as it is to narrow in scope. Does not cover radiation induced osteo necrosis and its treatment.-- Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 00:37, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
"Fossy jaw" redirects here, but there's a separate article on Phossy jaw. I'd fix this myself, but I frankly have no idea how to do so ... maybe I need a user account to do so 88.112.12.243 ( talk) 09:30, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
2011 paper: doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05929.x JFW | T@lk 22:21, 26 November 2011 (UTC)