This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Yorkshire Low‑importance Osmondthorpe railway station is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Trains: Stations / in UK Low‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject Stations. This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Can this be changed to read Osmondthorpe Halt in the heading of the article and wherever it occurs within the article.

Please refer to the references section, item 1, as my source for this request.

Xenophon Philosopher ( talk) 04:01, 9 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Xenophon Philosopher Hi - you could do the move yourself, using the MOVE function on the top right next to the search field? However, the station was only called Osmondthorpe Halt between 1930 and 1937. ^{[1] [2]} After that, it is just Osmondthorpe. So for 23 years, it wasn't called halt at all, and in the Bradshaws I have seen, even pre-1937, it is just called Osmondthorpe, so I say it should just stay as that. Additionally, I would state that Geograph isn't 100% a Reliable Source. Regards. The joy of all things ( talk) 08:56, 9 November 2021 (UTC) reply