This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
The article mentions iridosmium, and there is a redirect to here for Iridiosmium. Presumably, one of these is misspelled. Thefifthsetpin ( talk) 00:24, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Great article about the naming of this substance. But says nothing really about it. with a value of some worth must have a purpose. lattice structure of the various types of this substance... 2A00:23C4:E987:5001:8C9A:AA31:5C30:6B1 ( talk) 07:17, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
This whole page only has one source (about the Tasmanian mines). The value being unsourced is especially unreliable. 222Boarbot78 ( talk) 22:27, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
The article mentions iridosmium, and there is a redirect to here for Iridiosmium. Presumably, one of these is misspelled. Thefifthsetpin ( talk) 00:24, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Great article about the naming of this substance. But says nothing really about it. with a value of some worth must have a purpose. lattice structure of the various types of this substance... 2A00:23C4:E987:5001:8C9A:AA31:5C30:6B1 ( talk) 07:17, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
This whole page only has one source (about the Tasmanian mines). The value being unsourced is especially unreliable. 222Boarbot78 ( talk) 22:27, 18 February 2023 (UTC)