This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
I am removing the criticism section until we can all come to a consensus due to the following issues: The source you are using to cite this information would fall under the WP:SOURCES as a questionable source due to the fact that it ranks relatively low in popularity in Norway and has an admitted political agenda. Also, the way the entry is worded also makes absolute claims about a living individual which are not substantiated on that individuals wiki page or through the given source. Wrathofjames ( talk) 01:51, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
I have just restored the criticism and controversy section after it was arbitrarily deleted. OFF has drawn criticism and controversy. Including this on a WP page is a standard practice. WP pages are not puff pieces. If the person who deleted the section claims it is "biased" then those claims should be discussed here. Deleting whole sections is not the correct approach. You must show why it is "biased" and irrelevant. In fact, the criticism and controversies cited were both high profile, well-sourced and absolutely relevant to providing a full picture of this person. Deleting a whole section does not, in my view, show good faith. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThorWay ( talk • contribs) 06:26, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Is the first sentence at [3], OK?
The incident is notable, but possibly not a big deal—after Halvorssen's explanation (forthcoming—or possibly of the past) that in Venezuala "everyone" knows that they are related. (The Klassekampen article came after a multiple page interview in Dagens Næringsliv—where Halvorssen also claims that he has applied for becoming a citizen of Norway.) -- No parking here ( talk) 09:11, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Is the second sentence of this [4] version OK?
On the next day (in the same newspaper) an article claims the existence of a video, that shows López as an active participant in the attempted military coup against Hugo Chávez in 2002. [1] [2]
Klassekampen
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).{{
cite AV media}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |trans_title=
(
help); URL–wikilink conflict (
help)CS1 maint: unrecognized language (
link)
-- No parking here ( talk) 08:06, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
The 2011 event had sponsors. The only reference is a non-independent source—the website of the organizers. This text needs a tag about {{Independent source needed}}. -- Lowereiker ( talk) 10:01, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
The notability of the conferences seems clear on account of its speakers. The article probably should not use the term world leaders, because it is ambiguous. -- Lowereiker ( talk) 10:14, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 05:52, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
I am removing the criticism section until we can all come to a consensus due to the following issues: The source you are using to cite this information would fall under the WP:SOURCES as a questionable source due to the fact that it ranks relatively low in popularity in Norway and has an admitted political agenda. Also, the way the entry is worded also makes absolute claims about a living individual which are not substantiated on that individuals wiki page or through the given source. Wrathofjames ( talk) 01:51, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
I have just restored the criticism and controversy section after it was arbitrarily deleted. OFF has drawn criticism and controversy. Including this on a WP page is a standard practice. WP pages are not puff pieces. If the person who deleted the section claims it is "biased" then those claims should be discussed here. Deleting whole sections is not the correct approach. You must show why it is "biased" and irrelevant. In fact, the criticism and controversies cited were both high profile, well-sourced and absolutely relevant to providing a full picture of this person. Deleting a whole section does not, in my view, show good faith. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThorWay ( talk • contribs) 06:26, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Is the first sentence at [3], OK?
The incident is notable, but possibly not a big deal—after Halvorssen's explanation (forthcoming—or possibly of the past) that in Venezuala "everyone" knows that they are related. (The Klassekampen article came after a multiple page interview in Dagens Næringsliv—where Halvorssen also claims that he has applied for becoming a citizen of Norway.) -- No parking here ( talk) 09:11, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Is the second sentence of this [4] version OK?
On the next day (in the same newspaper) an article claims the existence of a video, that shows López as an active participant in the attempted military coup against Hugo Chávez in 2002. [1] [2]
Klassekampen
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).{{
cite AV media}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |trans_title=
(
help); URL–wikilink conflict (
help)CS1 maint: unrecognized language (
link)
-- No parking here ( talk) 08:06, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
The 2011 event had sponsors. The only reference is a non-independent source—the website of the organizers. This text needs a tag about {{Independent source needed}}. -- Lowereiker ( talk) 10:01, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
The notability of the conferences seems clear on account of its speakers. The article probably should not use the term world leaders, because it is ambiguous. -- Lowereiker ( talk) 10:14, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 05:52, 13 September 2018 (UTC)