![]() | Orrin Hatch 2000 presidential campaign has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 20, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Orrin Hatch 2000 presidential campaign appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 17 July 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk) 13:02, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Created by JJonahJackalope ( talk). Self-nominated at 21:00, 17 June 2022 (UTC).
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague ( talk · contribs) 05:20, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
I'd say the intro and background sections do a good job of reputation; it might be warranted to include some additional background information, though. At least specific policies/actions he was behind and would subsequently highlight during his run. For example, I've read his role in the
Religious Freedom Restoration Act's passage was noted by the press and the candidate himself. I believe it's all suitable as is, however.
Certain sources are used extensively and in different sections, but they do provide the bulk of available analysis of this pretty non-viable bid, so that is perfectly fine.
For the "Expressed interest" section, two things: when mention is made of his prowess on the judicial committee, it could be noted here his loss of support amongst some Republicans as per his cooperation with Clinton's bench nominees; also, and I'm not sure myself, did Hatch ever pointer to a presidential bid prior to 1999? If not, obviously no mention needed.
Was there ever an Orrin Hatch 2000 campaign website? I believe other candidates during the season's primaries had primeval webpages, but I wouldn't be stunned if Hatch's team did not put anything online
As for the aftermath section, I'm sure much else is needed. Hatch certainly partook in more than is listed, but little of it stems from this campaign. It might be applicable to add his subsequent presidential endorsements beyond Bush and before Trump even though they are a foregone conclusion. Lastly, maybe you could add some mention of Mitt Romney being the most successful Mormon presidential candidate by far 12 years later. Hatch hardly paved the path ahead for Mitt, but I would imagine someone asked for a comment on his run relative to their shared faith.
![]() | Orrin Hatch 2000 presidential campaign has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 20, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Orrin Hatch 2000 presidential campaign appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 17 July 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk) 13:02, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Created by JJonahJackalope ( talk). Self-nominated at 21:00, 17 June 2022 (UTC).
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague ( talk · contribs) 05:20, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
I'd say the intro and background sections do a good job of reputation; it might be warranted to include some additional background information, though. At least specific policies/actions he was behind and would subsequently highlight during his run. For example, I've read his role in the
Religious Freedom Restoration Act's passage was noted by the press and the candidate himself. I believe it's all suitable as is, however.
Certain sources are used extensively and in different sections, but they do provide the bulk of available analysis of this pretty non-viable bid, so that is perfectly fine.
For the "Expressed interest" section, two things: when mention is made of his prowess on the judicial committee, it could be noted here his loss of support amongst some Republicans as per his cooperation with Clinton's bench nominees; also, and I'm not sure myself, did Hatch ever pointer to a presidential bid prior to 1999? If not, obviously no mention needed.
Was there ever an Orrin Hatch 2000 campaign website? I believe other candidates during the season's primaries had primeval webpages, but I wouldn't be stunned if Hatch's team did not put anything online
As for the aftermath section, I'm sure much else is needed. Hatch certainly partook in more than is listed, but little of it stems from this campaign. It might be applicable to add his subsequent presidential endorsements beyond Bush and before Trump even though they are a foregone conclusion. Lastly, maybe you could add some mention of Mitt Romney being the most successful Mormon presidential candidate by far 12 years later. Hatch hardly paved the path ahead for Mitt, but I would imagine someone asked for a comment on his run relative to their shared faith.