 | This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
|
| This page was
proposed for deletion by
Damianmx (
talk ·
contribs) on 8 January 2016 with the comment: It appears that when this article was originally created by a well-intending user in 2006, it was unreferenced and written as a narrative with no clear sourcing. An entire six years later, the article either still lacks sourcing for essential points contained herein, some of which have remained unsourced for years, or contains sourced SYNTHESIS compiled in a way that formulates conclusions which may or may not have been intended by the original authors. This article has not added anything new or relevant to the discussion of dynastic origin already found on the Bagrationi page. Rather, it has created an additional venue for controversy and recurring conflicting edits and counteredits. When stripped of unsourced material and synthesis, this article would at best merit being a section or a subsection in the main article. It was seconded by Fayenatic london ( talk · contribs) on 8 January 2016 It was contested by The Emperor's New Spy ( talk · contribs) on 10 January 2016 with the comment: This article has room for improvement and warrants a AfD request |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
there are lots of uncleared meanings. and if you want to call bagratids armenians that u must paste any source were is said that bagratids were Armenians. i have edited page, and also i made a relible source from Fordham University library. everything what is written is sourced from there, DO NOT REEDIT or i will contact to administrator. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArsA-92 ( talk • contribs) 13:03, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- where is source? ther is not any, if u reedit it again i will make admin to block u. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeoFR ( talk • contribs) 13:49, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
why do u revert my edites? i made almost 13 reliable sources. do not reedit it again — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gergea1 ( talk • contribs) 17:51, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
|
| This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
|
| This page was
proposed for deletion by
Damianmx (
talk ·
contribs) on 8 January 2016 with the comment: It appears that when this article was originally created by a well-intending user in 2006, it was unreferenced and written as a narrative with no clear sourcing. An entire six years later, the article either still lacks sourcing for essential points contained herein, some of which have remained unsourced for years, or contains sourced SYNTHESIS compiled in a way that formulates conclusions which may or may not have been intended by the original authors. This article has not added anything new or relevant to the discussion of dynastic origin already found on the Bagrationi page. Rather, it has created an additional venue for controversy and recurring conflicting edits and counteredits. When stripped of unsourced material and synthesis, this article would at best merit being a section or a subsection in the main article. It was seconded by Fayenatic london ( talk · contribs) on 8 January 2016 It was contested by The Emperor's New Spy ( talk · contribs) on 10 January 2016 with the comment: This article has room for improvement and warrants a AfD request |
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
there are lots of uncleared meanings. and if you want to call bagratids armenians that u must paste any source were is said that bagratids were Armenians. i have edited page, and also i made a relible source from Fordham University library. everything what is written is sourced from there, DO NOT REEDIT or i will contact to administrator. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArsA-92 ( talk • contribs) 13:03, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- where is source? ther is not any, if u reedit it again i will make admin to block u. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeoFR ( talk • contribs) 13:49, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
why do u revert my edites? i made almost 13 reliable sources. do not reedit it again — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gergea1 ( talk • contribs) 17:51, 22 June 2012 (UTC)