![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I propose that this article and Asian studies be merged. As both articles note: "in recent years the newer term 'Asian studies' has mostly replaced 'Oriental studies'." The content of "Oriental studies" is more comprehensive ("Asian studies" is a stub) so I propose to: 1) Add the content of the "Asian studies" article to this article, 2) make "Asian studies" a redirect to "Oriental studies," 3) move this article to Asian studies (over redirect), and 4) revise the lead of the article and edit for consistency. "Oriental studies" would then be a redirect to the merged article "Asian studies." If there general agreement to do this, I will complete this move on July 10, 2010. Sunray ( talk) 17:06, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
I have just removed an entire paragraph of what seems to be uncited personal research, unless you CAN cite PLEASE keep your personal ideology to yourself. Twobells ( talk) 18:14, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Multiple congresses of orientalists were held in various locations, and orientalists from all over the world gave presentations of their fieldwork in linguistics, ethnography, and other fields, we should really create separate articles about each congress and their participants. Rajmaan ( talk) 19:28, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Sources on presentations during the event
http://books.google.com/books?id=0MMVAAAAYAAJ&pg=RA1-PA383#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=uGAaAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA383#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=JcoUAAAAIAAJ&pg=RA1-PA147#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=EGbQAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA87#v=onepage&q&f=false
Rajmaan ( talk) 06:18, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 0 external links on Oriental studies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://bostonreview.net/When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:23, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Oriental studies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:47, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Per the articles, Asian studies is the term used usually in North America and Australia for what in Europe is known as
Oriental studies.
WP:MULTIPLENAMES says that articles should be about concepts, not names, so these pages should be located at the same place. I'm proposing that "Asian studies" be the destination, since my sense is that "Oriental studies" is becoming an increasingly unfashionable term with racist connotations, but that might just be my perspective given my geographical background. If necessary, we can separate out the discussion on what the title should be, but that shouldn't muddy the need for a merge. {{u|
Sdkb}}
talk 15:24, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
A term with many related meanings should be presented as an article on the broadest understanding of the term. It also speaks specifically to overlapping geographic designations:
Varying uses for broad geographic terms can be discussed in the context of an article describing the overall agreement of which areas definitely fall within that designation, and which areas are only occasionally described as falling with that designation, for certain purposes.Both articles currently define the fields the same way—as the study of Asia—so if they are to be kept separate, we'd need to establish a distinction and establish that it's meaningful enough that the articles should not be merged.
The majority of this content is already present on the older and more established page
Kazamzam (
talk) 01:45, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I propose that this article and Asian studies be merged. As both articles note: "in recent years the newer term 'Asian studies' has mostly replaced 'Oriental studies'." The content of "Oriental studies" is more comprehensive ("Asian studies" is a stub) so I propose to: 1) Add the content of the "Asian studies" article to this article, 2) make "Asian studies" a redirect to "Oriental studies," 3) move this article to Asian studies (over redirect), and 4) revise the lead of the article and edit for consistency. "Oriental studies" would then be a redirect to the merged article "Asian studies." If there general agreement to do this, I will complete this move on July 10, 2010. Sunray ( talk) 17:06, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
I have just removed an entire paragraph of what seems to be uncited personal research, unless you CAN cite PLEASE keep your personal ideology to yourself. Twobells ( talk) 18:14, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Multiple congresses of orientalists were held in various locations, and orientalists from all over the world gave presentations of their fieldwork in linguistics, ethnography, and other fields, we should really create separate articles about each congress and their participants. Rajmaan ( talk) 19:28, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Sources on presentations during the event
http://books.google.com/books?id=0MMVAAAAYAAJ&pg=RA1-PA383#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=uGAaAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA383#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=JcoUAAAAIAAJ&pg=RA1-PA147#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=EGbQAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA87#v=onepage&q&f=false
Rajmaan ( talk) 06:18, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 0 external links on Oriental studies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://bostonreview.net/When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:23, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Oriental studies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:47, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Per the articles, Asian studies is the term used usually in North America and Australia for what in Europe is known as
Oriental studies.
WP:MULTIPLENAMES says that articles should be about concepts, not names, so these pages should be located at the same place. I'm proposing that "Asian studies" be the destination, since my sense is that "Oriental studies" is becoming an increasingly unfashionable term with racist connotations, but that might just be my perspective given my geographical background. If necessary, we can separate out the discussion on what the title should be, but that shouldn't muddy the need for a merge. {{u|
Sdkb}}
talk 15:24, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
A term with many related meanings should be presented as an article on the broadest understanding of the term. It also speaks specifically to overlapping geographic designations:
Varying uses for broad geographic terms can be discussed in the context of an article describing the overall agreement of which areas definitely fall within that designation, and which areas are only occasionally described as falling with that designation, for certain purposes.Both articles currently define the fields the same way—as the study of Asia—so if they are to be kept separate, we'd need to establish a distinction and establish that it's meaningful enough that the articles should not be merged.
The majority of this content is already present on the older and more established page
Kazamzam (
talk) 01:45, 21 July 2022 (UTC)