 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Good article nomination - Passed
Overall, a thorough, well-written article. The only complaint I can muster is that it's a bit long, probably because it's a very broad topic. If anyone can find an efficient way to chop this article into a few different articles, it may increase readability, and allow readers to more quickly find the information they're interested in.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Snottywong ( talk • contribs)
GA status
Currently the GA folks are going through and reviewing all GA articles, and I don't think this would pass again. Looking at the reviewed version, it should not have passed to begin with. It's currently better, but has some issues with peacock terms and a few citations needed. I've moved some sections around to try and get rid of white space issues caused by pictures and expanded the lead, as well as re-worked some of the pictures location/caption. Hopefully this looks right on other's computers too. Aboutmovies 08:11, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
GA Sweeps
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, OhanaUnited Talk page 14:58, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
| This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Good article nomination - Passed
Overall, a thorough, well-written article. The only complaint I can muster is that it's a bit long, probably because it's a very broad topic. If anyone can find an efficient way to chop this article into a few different articles, it may increase readability, and allow readers to more quickly find the information they're interested in.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Snottywong ( talk • contribs)
GA status
Currently the GA folks are going through and reviewing all GA articles, and I don't think this would pass again. Looking at the reviewed version, it should not have passed to begin with. It's currently better, but has some issues with peacock terms and a few citations needed. I've moved some sections around to try and get rid of white space issues caused by pictures and expanded the lead, as well as re-worked some of the pictures location/caption. Hopefully this looks right on other's computers too. Aboutmovies 08:11, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
GA Sweeps
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, OhanaUnited Talk page 14:58, 14 June 2008 (UTC)