This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of
Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to
Supreme Court cases and the
Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
I wikified it as best as I could. However, I am not a lawyer and Wikipedia does not have very many legal definitions for linking. For example, mitigation lead to a huge article on Environmental Mitigation, as if that is the entire meaning of mitigation. (Same problem with the word "evole" by the way: all roads lead to Evolution).
I've redirected many of the links to the articles on legal topics. In the case of mitigation, this redirected to
environmental mitigation, which has a link at the top directing one to the correct legal article on
extenuating circumstances. The same is also true of
evolution, btw; note the link to
evolution (disambiguation) at the top.
When generally writing an article, excessive wikilinking is discouraged. Only terms that are central to the article should be linked to (or for which a further explanation would help understanding of this article), and should only be linked no more than once per article section.
Postdlf23:45, 6 June 2006 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of
Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to
Supreme Court cases and the
Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
I wikified it as best as I could. However, I am not a lawyer and Wikipedia does not have very many legal definitions for linking. For example, mitigation lead to a huge article on Environmental Mitigation, as if that is the entire meaning of mitigation. (Same problem with the word "evole" by the way: all roads lead to Evolution).
I've redirected many of the links to the articles on legal topics. In the case of mitigation, this redirected to
environmental mitigation, which has a link at the top directing one to the correct legal article on
extenuating circumstances. The same is also true of
evolution, btw; note the link to
evolution (disambiguation) at the top.
When generally writing an article, excessive wikilinking is discouraged. Only terms that are central to the article should be linked to (or for which a further explanation would help understanding of this article), and should only be linked no more than once per article section.
Postdlf23:45, 6 June 2006 (UTC)reply