This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Oregon Ducks track and field article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Oregon Ducks track and field has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
February 14, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
Bill Bowerman, a coach for the
Oregon Ducks track and field team, created the first
Nike prototype shoe by pouring rubber into his wife's
waffle iron? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
The image File:Bowerman4-1-.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:33, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Cluskillz ( talk · contribs) asked me for some feedback on this article. I just gave it a quick read, and have the following observations; I will try to return with a more thorough review when time permits.
As I said, this is all based on a very quick skim; so I will try to read it more thoroughly soon. But I think the article is ready to be proposed at GA now -- in my opinion, any issues preventing its promotion there should be pretty minor, and readily addressed by the time it's reviewed. Good work! - Pete ( talk) 00:03, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Oregon Ducks track and field article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Oregon Ducks track and field has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
February 14, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
Bill Bowerman, a coach for the
Oregon Ducks track and field team, created the first
Nike prototype shoe by pouring rubber into his wife's
waffle iron? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
The image File:Bowerman4-1-.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:33, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Cluskillz ( talk · contribs) asked me for some feedback on this article. I just gave it a quick read, and have the following observations; I will try to return with a more thorough review when time permits.
As I said, this is all based on a very quick skim; so I will try to read it more thoroughly soon. But I think the article is ready to be proposed at GA now -- in my opinion, any issues preventing its promotion there should be pretty minor, and readily addressed by the time it's reviewed. Good work! - Pete ( talk) 00:03, 11 February 2011 (UTC)