A fact from Ordot Dump appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 March 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Micronesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Micronesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicronesiaWikipedia:WikiProject MicronesiaTemplate:WikiProject MicronesiaMicronesia articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 18:48, 20 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Created by
Featous (
talk). Self-nominated at 21:51, 11 February 2022 (UTC).reply
New enough and long enough. QPQ not needed; fewer than five credits. Article is quite interesting.
Featous, I'd like to see the Reuters piece cited inline on the sentence that mentions this as a unanimous verdict, as there is no citation on the sentence with the hook fact, but that's all that is needed for approval of this page.
Sammi Brie (she/her •
t •
c) 06:55, 16 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Reuters citation added to the sentence in question. Thanks! -
Featous (
talk) 13:53, 16 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Pinging @
Sammi Brie: to complete review (i.e.: add tick if warranted). –
Reidgreg (
talk) 15:22, 20 March 2022 (UTC)reply
This is why I like being pinged,
Featous... Tick granted.
Sammi Brie (she/her •
t •
c) 16:41, 20 March 2022 (UTC)reply
A fact from Ordot Dump appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 March 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Micronesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Micronesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicronesiaWikipedia:WikiProject MicronesiaTemplate:WikiProject MicronesiaMicronesia articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk) 18:48, 20 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Created by
Featous (
talk). Self-nominated at 21:51, 11 February 2022 (UTC).reply
New enough and long enough. QPQ not needed; fewer than five credits. Article is quite interesting.
Featous, I'd like to see the Reuters piece cited inline on the sentence that mentions this as a unanimous verdict, as there is no citation on the sentence with the hook fact, but that's all that is needed for approval of this page.
Sammi Brie (she/her •
t •
c) 06:55, 16 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Reuters citation added to the sentence in question. Thanks! -
Featous (
talk) 13:53, 16 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Pinging @
Sammi Brie: to complete review (i.e.: add tick if warranted). –
Reidgreg (
talk) 15:22, 20 March 2022 (UTC)reply
This is why I like being pinged,
Featous... Tick granted.
Sammi Brie (she/her •
t •
c) 16:41, 20 March 2022 (UTC)reply