From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... there is no promotional text; there is a ref to independent review from Infoworld; this is a new, notable product from a major, no-bullshit company. -- Staszek Lem ( talk) 22:39, 24 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Single source

The article is based almost exclusively on the information from the vendor. More information must be referenced from independent sources. Staszek Lem ( talk) 18:17, 13 July 2015 (UTC) reply

The fact that it is a predominantly single source raises a reasonable doubt in the neutrality of the article. In particular, there is no criticism, nor comparison with competition. Staszek Lem ( talk) 18:20, 13 July 2015 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... there is no promotional text; there is a ref to independent review from Infoworld; this is a new, notable product from a major, no-bullshit company. -- Staszek Lem ( talk) 22:39, 24 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Single source

The article is based almost exclusively on the information from the vendor. More information must be referenced from independent sources. Staszek Lem ( talk) 18:17, 13 July 2015 (UTC) reply

The fact that it is a predominantly single source raises a reasonable doubt in the neutrality of the article. In particular, there is no criticism, nor comparison with competition. Staszek Lem ( talk) 18:20, 13 July 2015 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook