![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
The "lead" shown in this article is inaccurate. In Sweden ALL governments are formed from a coalition. Thus, at NO TIME, have the Swedish Democrats had any kind of meaningful "lead" - which this article implies they have had. The reality is that the left coalition have a more or less continual lead over the right coalition (which does not include the SD). Not that I expect the article to be changed.. there is a lot of creeping nationalist bias in Wikipedia, and this is just one more example of it. 213.114.20.132 ( talk) 09:55, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
In case you missed it, 50% if the whole article shows exactly, what you wrote: /info/en/?search=Opinion_polling_for_the_Swedish_general_election,_2018#Coalitions/Blocs
The article shows very clear that the coalitions always had a lead oder SD. So whats your point?
The more interesting question is, why is there such a huge difference between the institutes? Which one is more trustworthy? I have no idea, I am not Swedish. Especially the Greens (MP) and the Right (SD) are extremely different in between institutes.. maybe its difficult to measure corretly because of small population number? Or some instutites are biased? If Yes, which ones? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.201.5.234 ( talk) 17:53, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
The problem is different. The blocks in swedish politics is different now compared to the previous election. There is a pro-migration block which includes the center party and KD. And there is an anti-migration block with M-L-SD So the coalitions shown are outdated and unrealistic. They are from the previous election. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.93.55.37 ( talk) 15:40, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
As a reader who only came here because Andrew Neil on BBC1's This Week briefly said last week that the 'anti-immigration Sweden Democrats' (or words to that effect) were 'leading in the polls', it seems to me that this article has some problems for the casual non-Swedish reader such as me.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Opinion polling for the Swedish general election, 2018. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://ipsos.se/sites/default/files/pdf/DN-Ipsos-valjarbarometer-januari-2017.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.skop.se/main/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/SKOPs-V%C3%A4ljarbarometer-30-december-2015.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://ipsos.se/sites/default/files/pdf/DN%20Ipsos%20valjarbarometer%2020151127.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://ipsos.se/sites/default/files/pdf/DN_Ipsos%20valjarbarometer%2020151027.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.skop.se/main/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/SKOPs-V%C3%A4ljarbarometer-23-oktober-20151.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://ipsos.se/sites/default/files/pdf/DN-Ipsos-valjarbarometer-januari-2017.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.skop.se/main/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/SKOPs-V%C3%A4ljarbarometer-30-december-2015.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://ipsos.se/sites/default/files/pdf/DN%20Ipsos%20valjarbarometer%2020151127.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://ipsos.se/sites/default/files/pdf/DN_Ipsos%20valjarbarometer%2020151027.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.skop.se/main/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/SKOPs-V%C3%A4ljarbarometer-23-oktober-20151.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:45, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
The "lead" shown in this article is inaccurate. In Sweden ALL governments are formed from a coalition. Thus, at NO TIME, have the Swedish Democrats had any kind of meaningful "lead" - which this article implies they have had. The reality is that the left coalition have a more or less continual lead over the right coalition (which does not include the SD). Not that I expect the article to be changed.. there is a lot of creeping nationalist bias in Wikipedia, and this is just one more example of it. 213.114.20.132 ( talk) 09:55, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
In case you missed it, 50% if the whole article shows exactly, what you wrote: /info/en/?search=Opinion_polling_for_the_Swedish_general_election,_2018#Coalitions/Blocs
The article shows very clear that the coalitions always had a lead oder SD. So whats your point?
The more interesting question is, why is there such a huge difference between the institutes? Which one is more trustworthy? I have no idea, I am not Swedish. Especially the Greens (MP) and the Right (SD) are extremely different in between institutes.. maybe its difficult to measure corretly because of small population number? Or some instutites are biased? If Yes, which ones? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.201.5.234 ( talk) 17:53, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
The problem is different. The blocks in swedish politics is different now compared to the previous election. There is a pro-migration block which includes the center party and KD. And there is an anti-migration block with M-L-SD So the coalitions shown are outdated and unrealistic. They are from the previous election. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.93.55.37 ( talk) 15:40, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
As a reader who only came here because Andrew Neil on BBC1's This Week briefly said last week that the 'anti-immigration Sweden Democrats' (or words to that effect) were 'leading in the polls', it seems to me that this article has some problems for the casual non-Swedish reader such as me.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Opinion polling for the Swedish general election, 2018. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://ipsos.se/sites/default/files/pdf/DN-Ipsos-valjarbarometer-januari-2017.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.skop.se/main/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/SKOPs-V%C3%A4ljarbarometer-30-december-2015.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://ipsos.se/sites/default/files/pdf/DN%20Ipsos%20valjarbarometer%2020151127.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://ipsos.se/sites/default/files/pdf/DN_Ipsos%20valjarbarometer%2020151027.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.skop.se/main/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/SKOPs-V%C3%A4ljarbarometer-23-oktober-20151.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://ipsos.se/sites/default/files/pdf/DN-Ipsos-valjarbarometer-januari-2017.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.skop.se/main/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/SKOPs-V%C3%A4ljarbarometer-30-december-2015.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://ipsos.se/sites/default/files/pdf/DN%20Ipsos%20valjarbarometer%2020151127.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://ipsos.se/sites/default/files/pdf/DN_Ipsos%20valjarbarometer%2020151027.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.skop.se/main/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/SKOPs-V%C3%A4ljarbarometer-23-oktober-20151.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:45, 21 November 2017 (UTC)