![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
This article doesn't really seem to have a purpose - it has even *less* information than Next Austrian legislative election, and is better than the latter only in that its headers have pictures, and there's a "Lead" column in the right. And while it's possible to get rid of the chart in the main article and copy all of it here... then the main article would have very little information. Thus, I believe merging the two is the best option. What are everyone's thoughts? Chuborno ( talk) 01:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
While I previously strongly argued against using turquoise as the ÖVP's colour, since I assumed it was only used for their marketing material (similar to ÖVP state parties using green, yellow and other colours as the main colours of their advertising), I have now changed it to turqoise after all. The BMI (Interior Ministry) decided to standardise the colours the parties will be shown in in charts and tables, and asked them to give their official RGB values to the BMI; the ÖVP submitted turquoise. — Nightstallion 12:49, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Please, read this message. I have just changed the background colours to the ones which were always used in this article from 2013 to August 2017. You can see that what I say is true if you look for these colours in the 2013-2014 table. There is an obvious difference between the lead and result colour of each party, so you can't use both of them to do the same thing. However, if you want to change them and use the same colours for the lead and the result of the parties, then change them all from 2013. 5.34.154.217 ( talk) 11:19, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
This article doesn't really seem to have a purpose - it has even *less* information than Next Austrian legislative election, and is better than the latter only in that its headers have pictures, and there's a "Lead" column in the right. And while it's possible to get rid of the chart in the main article and copy all of it here... then the main article would have very little information. Thus, I believe merging the two is the best option. What are everyone's thoughts? Chuborno ( talk) 01:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
While I previously strongly argued against using turquoise as the ÖVP's colour, since I assumed it was only used for their marketing material (similar to ÖVP state parties using green, yellow and other colours as the main colours of their advertising), I have now changed it to turqoise after all. The BMI (Interior Ministry) decided to standardise the colours the parties will be shown in in charts and tables, and asked them to give their official RGB values to the BMI; the ÖVP submitted turquoise. — Nightstallion 12:49, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Please, read this message. I have just changed the background colours to the ones which were always used in this article from 2013 to August 2017. You can see that what I say is true if you look for these colours in the 2013-2014 table. There is an obvious difference between the lead and result colour of each party, so you can't use both of them to do the same thing. However, if you want to change them and use the same colours for the lead and the result of the parties, then change them all from 2013. 5.34.154.217 ( talk) 11:19, 14 October 2017 (UTC)