This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

British Empire This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Military history: Asian / Indian / South Asia / World War I Start‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Asian military history task force Indian military history task force South Asian military history task force World War I task force

The incidents in South Waziristan during November 1915 were not in any way connected with the earlier operations in Mohmand, Buner and Swat.
Khajuri Kach on the Gomal is some 200km from Shabkadr. The last sentence does not belong in this article.
FwdObserver ( talk) 11:49, 11 September 2009 (UTC) reply

To avoid any confusion with the earlier operations in Mohmand, Swat, and Buner, i propose moving this page unto Operations against the Mohmands, Bunerwals and Swatis (1915).
-- FwdObserver ( talk) 03:52, 19 September 2009 (UTC) reply