This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: North America / United States This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated task forces: /  North American military history task force United States military history task force Somalia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somalia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somalia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomaliaWikipedia:WikiProject SomaliaTemplate:WikiProject SomaliaWikiProject Somalia articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. International relations: United Nations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations.

Who exactly is this 'Lance Corporal Trent Norden', maybe he is in some way significant but this is not explained. Otherwise, it would appear to be vanity information. An explanation is required I believe. Hydraton31 22:43, 12 July 2006 (UTC) reply

Nah, you were right, vanity anonymous IP edit, thanks for the catch! :) Sherurcij ^{( Speaker for the Dead)} 23:01, 12 July 2006 (UTC) reply

Why is this categorized within "Non-combat military operations involving the United States"? There were "combat incidents" involved (U.S. forces shooting, being shot at, etc.), combat "decorations" (none for valor, as far as I know, however) were awarded, etc. Evets70 ( talk) 21:12, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply