![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
India,
Pakistan, and
Afghanistan, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
@ Rfghjkc:, instead of edit warring, I think it's more appropriate for us to discuss our differences with regards to each other's edits and hopefully come to a resolution.
These are the issues I have with your edits, which began here:
Ultimately, I appreciate your efforts and I'm convinced your edits are in good faith but I'm opposed to you repeatedly adding things without verifiable sources.
If anyone wants to provide a third opinion, feel free. TheArmchairSoldier ( talk) 13:07, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
@ Maurice Oly: Could you please elaborate on why you’re so opposed to the inclusion of this reference?
https://www.facebook.com/airbornesappers/posts/1295645940906410
You’ve removed it a number of times, stating it’s against WP:UGC because it’s a social media source. I’m sure you’re aware that it’s not a binary issue and that some social media posts are permissible under some circumstances. I strongly believe this to be the case here. The source is an official RAF Facebook page publishing information released by the RAF. Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong — you’re clearly the more experienced editor here — but does that not make it usable as per WP:FACEBOOK? TheArmchairSoldier ( talk) 15:36, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
@ TheArmchairSoldier: I generally prefer not to use Facebook as anybody can put anything on Facebook and claim it to be true.
I was however unaware of WP:FACEBOOK so with that in mind I will let facebook be used in this page due to the page being official RAF facebook page. Maurice Oly ( talk) 15:44, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
India,
Pakistan, and
Afghanistan, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
@ Rfghjkc:, instead of edit warring, I think it's more appropriate for us to discuss our differences with regards to each other's edits and hopefully come to a resolution.
These are the issues I have with your edits, which began here:
Ultimately, I appreciate your efforts and I'm convinced your edits are in good faith but I'm opposed to you repeatedly adding things without verifiable sources.
If anyone wants to provide a third opinion, feel free. TheArmchairSoldier ( talk) 13:07, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
@ Maurice Oly: Could you please elaborate on why you’re so opposed to the inclusion of this reference?
https://www.facebook.com/airbornesappers/posts/1295645940906410
You’ve removed it a number of times, stating it’s against WP:UGC because it’s a social media source. I’m sure you’re aware that it’s not a binary issue and that some social media posts are permissible under some circumstances. I strongly believe this to be the case here. The source is an official RAF Facebook page publishing information released by the RAF. Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong — you’re clearly the more experienced editor here — but does that not make it usable as per WP:FACEBOOK? TheArmchairSoldier ( talk) 15:36, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
@ TheArmchairSoldier: I generally prefer not to use Facebook as anybody can put anything on Facebook and claim it to be true.
I was however unaware of WP:FACEBOOK so with that in mind I will let facebook be used in this page due to the page being official RAF facebook page. Maurice Oly ( talk) 15:44, 13 September 2021 (UTC)