This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Operation Pig Bristle article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Operation Pig Bristle has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 9, 2015. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Operation Pig Bristle appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 15 June 2013 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
on your DYK, and thank you for a most enlightening article. Amandajm ( talk) 11:21, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Ian Rose ( talk · contribs) 23:46, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Nick, should be able to review this week. Cheers,
Ian Rose (
talk)
23:46, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Toolbox check -- no dablink or EL issues
Prose/structure/detail -- apart from my very minor edits, couldn't fault anything here
Referencing -- citation formatting/density fine and sources reliable
Images -- obviously no licensing issues with no images; I suppose you could throw in a 38SQN Dakota shot for context but will leave to you
Well done, Nick, happy to pass as GA. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 10:18, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Operation Pig Bristle article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Operation Pig Bristle has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 9, 2015. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Operation Pig Bristle appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 15 June 2013 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
on your DYK, and thank you for a most enlightening article. Amandajm ( talk) 11:21, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Ian Rose ( talk · contribs) 23:46, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Nick, should be able to review this week. Cheers,
Ian Rose (
talk)
23:46, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Toolbox check -- no dablink or EL issues
Prose/structure/detail -- apart from my very minor edits, couldn't fault anything here
Referencing -- citation formatting/density fine and sources reliable
Images -- obviously no licensing issues with no images; I suppose you could throw in a 38SQN Dakota shot for context but will leave to you
Well done, Nick, happy to pass as GA. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 10:18, 9 April 2015 (UTC)