This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Operation Okra article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
no consensus for the use of flags, um then why do all the other operation articles seem to have them? Also why did Nick-D undo my edit for the leaders infobox? Craig Orme is not a leader, he is not authorizing the airstrikes.-- Empire of War ( talk) 06:05, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
"Operational plan" doesn't seem to be totally appropriate. (e.g. MajGen Orme is commanding it - it would be his J5 who is planning it.)
But I haven't been able to find anything particularly appropriate.
Many of the operations seem to be one of the sections on a page which uses a "Military conflict" infobox.
Perhaps a new template (e.g. "Military Operation") needs creation?
Pdfpdf (
talk)
02:53, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
A lot of the text in the airstrikes table looks like it comes straight from the ADF webpage for this operation. It probably should be reworded.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.169.213.76 ( talk) 11:05, 18 November 2014
[1] The Air Force seems to believe this might go on for a while. Plan is for rotation of the deployment between the 3 operational classic hornet squadrons and 1 operational super hornet squadron, each of six months. 101.169.127.231 ( talk) 11:03, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Could someone explain to me why the articles covering American, British, Canadian, French, German and Turkish interventions against ISIL all have military conflict infoboxes, and Operation Okra doesn't, despite having similar sized articles? They aren't taking on ISIL by themselves either, which was the reason my edit was undone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrAustin390 ( talk • contribs) 13:55, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Operation Okra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Operation Okra article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
no consensus for the use of flags, um then why do all the other operation articles seem to have them? Also why did Nick-D undo my edit for the leaders infobox? Craig Orme is not a leader, he is not authorizing the airstrikes.-- Empire of War ( talk) 06:05, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
"Operational plan" doesn't seem to be totally appropriate. (e.g. MajGen Orme is commanding it - it would be his J5 who is planning it.)
But I haven't been able to find anything particularly appropriate.
Many of the operations seem to be one of the sections on a page which uses a "Military conflict" infobox.
Perhaps a new template (e.g. "Military Operation") needs creation?
Pdfpdf (
talk)
02:53, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
A lot of the text in the airstrikes table looks like it comes straight from the ADF webpage for this operation. It probably should be reworded.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.169.213.76 ( talk) 11:05, 18 November 2014
[1] The Air Force seems to believe this might go on for a while. Plan is for rotation of the deployment between the 3 operational classic hornet squadrons and 1 operational super hornet squadron, each of six months. 101.169.127.231 ( talk) 11:03, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Could someone explain to me why the articles covering American, British, Canadian, French, German and Turkish interventions against ISIL all have military conflict infoboxes, and Operation Okra doesn't, despite having similar sized articles? They aren't taking on ISIL by themselves either, which was the reason my edit was undone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrAustin390 ( talk • contribs) 13:55, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Operation Okra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC)