The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for creating the article!.
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:17, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Cengo-1992 I have reverted your latest edit because it refers to 2 Turkish civilian casualties which is already included in the combatants3 section of the infobox. Ecrusized ( talk) 14:11, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
@ Des Vallee: I think some of your additions to the reactions section should be removed because they are quite irrelevant. The alleged reaction of Iran should be removed entirely as its a claim made by a Lebanese official which is subsequently denied as having taken place by a Turkish official. The condemnation minor EU parties like The Left in the European Parliament – GUE/NGL is also quite irrelevant to be included in the article. Ecrusized ( talk) 15:36, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
Ecrusized The article has verbatim a section called "Pentagon opposed to military action." I don't know if you didn't see this or if you thought it was a different section, but you need to read things carefully its very important. Des Vallee ( talk) 16:51, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
References
There is a current dispute on the section of international responses. The bombing campaign of Syria has been met with hard opposition from the US, and most sources have consensus on this, with the US publicly stating it opposes any Turkish intervention, with US troops being stationed with the SDF in Syria. 1 2 Ecrusized wants to include a series of quotes of US condemnation to the 2022 Istanbul bombing yet I find these quotes are completely unrelated, they should be included in that article not this. The text of "The Pentagon opposes any Turkish intervention" is directly sourced from the DoD quote "The Department of Defense continues to oppose any military action that destabilizes the situation in Syria or violates Iraq’s sovereignty through military actions uncoordinated." I find this is a good description of the source yet Ecrusized states this is editorialization. A third opinion would be generally helpful. Des Vallee ( talk) 17:40, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
@ ThePaganUK: I have reverted your latest edit because it lacked substance. There is no reason to write about every soldier or fighter killed during the conflict unless it stands out for a particular reason. Such as, resulting in an escalation of the conflict. Or it occurs for the first time during the conflict. Or otherwise is significant. The article is currently very brief, and adding every single killing would disrubt its weight. 16:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC) Ecrusized ( talk) 16:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Casualties and losses per Turkey are not "none". The numbers have increased and need to be updated. 46.31.118.93 ( talk) 06:22, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for creating the article!.
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:17, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Cengo-1992 I have reverted your latest edit because it refers to 2 Turkish civilian casualties which is already included in the combatants3 section of the infobox. Ecrusized ( talk) 14:11, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
@ Des Vallee: I think some of your additions to the reactions section should be removed because they are quite irrelevant. The alleged reaction of Iran should be removed entirely as its a claim made by a Lebanese official which is subsequently denied as having taken place by a Turkish official. The condemnation minor EU parties like The Left in the European Parliament – GUE/NGL is also quite irrelevant to be included in the article. Ecrusized ( talk) 15:36, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
Ecrusized The article has verbatim a section called "Pentagon opposed to military action." I don't know if you didn't see this or if you thought it was a different section, but you need to read things carefully its very important. Des Vallee ( talk) 16:51, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
References
There is a current dispute on the section of international responses. The bombing campaign of Syria has been met with hard opposition from the US, and most sources have consensus on this, with the US publicly stating it opposes any Turkish intervention, with US troops being stationed with the SDF in Syria. 1 2 Ecrusized wants to include a series of quotes of US condemnation to the 2022 Istanbul bombing yet I find these quotes are completely unrelated, they should be included in that article not this. The text of "The Pentagon opposes any Turkish intervention" is directly sourced from the DoD quote "The Department of Defense continues to oppose any military action that destabilizes the situation in Syria or violates Iraq’s sovereignty through military actions uncoordinated." I find this is a good description of the source yet Ecrusized states this is editorialization. A third opinion would be generally helpful. Des Vallee ( talk) 17:40, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
@ ThePaganUK: I have reverted your latest edit because it lacked substance. There is no reason to write about every soldier or fighter killed during the conflict unless it stands out for a particular reason. Such as, resulting in an escalation of the conflict. Or it occurs for the first time during the conflict. Or otherwise is significant. The article is currently very brief, and adding every single killing would disrubt its weight. 16:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC) Ecrusized ( talk) 16:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Casualties and losses per Turkey are not "none". The numbers have increased and need to be updated. 46.31.118.93 ( talk) 06:22, 5 December 2022 (UTC)