This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Operation Barrel Roll article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I was going to move this page, but I want to see if I was right in my suspicions. The word "Barrel" in this article title is spelled incorrectly (there's an extra l). All sources I've seen on this topic say it's spelled "barrel". Would it be improper to move this article to its correct spelling? .V. Talk| Email 12:37, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
There are any number of better photos of T-28s in Laos than the black-on-black obscurity presently in the article. Cannot someone with skills superior to mine dub one in?
Also, a photo of a forward air control plane would be great, whether an O-1, O-2, or OV-10. And a photo of fighter-bombers, preferably in action against the Ho Chi Minh Trail.
Georgejdorner ( talk) 23:22, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
There's a note in the conclusion that "The War in Northern Laos" would never see the light of day. Here's a link that could use digesting. I intend to read up on it myself, but I'm not much of a wiki coder.
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB248/index.htm
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB248/war_in_northern_laos.pdf — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
75.72.150.130 (
talk) 14:25, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
The source [26] is a glimpse of a dated article from wayback machine. It also doesn't even address what is written in the last part of the conclusion. The text also make a lot of assumption without any backing.
A more reliable source should be added and the text rewritten 85.170.116.84 ( talk) 23:57, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Article no longer meets A-Class criteria - Hawkeye7 ( talk) via MilHistBot ( talk) 22:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Instructions for nominators and reviewers
Operation Barrel Roll ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Toolbox |
---|
This article was promoted to A class in 2007. It does not remotely pass muster for A class now. Almost half of the content is uncited. Schierbecker ( talk) 16:30, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Operation Barrel Roll article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I was going to move this page, but I want to see if I was right in my suspicions. The word "Barrel" in this article title is spelled incorrectly (there's an extra l). All sources I've seen on this topic say it's spelled "barrel". Would it be improper to move this article to its correct spelling? .V. Talk| Email 12:37, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
There are any number of better photos of T-28s in Laos than the black-on-black obscurity presently in the article. Cannot someone with skills superior to mine dub one in?
Also, a photo of a forward air control plane would be great, whether an O-1, O-2, or OV-10. And a photo of fighter-bombers, preferably in action against the Ho Chi Minh Trail.
Georgejdorner ( talk) 23:22, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
There's a note in the conclusion that "The War in Northern Laos" would never see the light of day. Here's a link that could use digesting. I intend to read up on it myself, but I'm not much of a wiki coder.
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB248/index.htm
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB248/war_in_northern_laos.pdf — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
75.72.150.130 (
talk) 14:25, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
The source [26] is a glimpse of a dated article from wayback machine. It also doesn't even address what is written in the last part of the conclusion. The text also make a lot of assumption without any backing.
A more reliable source should be added and the text rewritten 85.170.116.84 ( talk) 23:57, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Article no longer meets A-Class criteria - Hawkeye7 ( talk) via MilHistBot ( talk) 22:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Instructions for nominators and reviewers
Operation Barrel Roll ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Toolbox |
---|
This article was promoted to A class in 2007. It does not remotely pass muster for A class now. Almost half of the content is uncited. Schierbecker ( talk) 16:30, 22 March 2024 (UTC)