This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Operation Arabian Knight article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on June 8, 2010. The result of the discussion was keep. |
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This is international front page news (New York Times, of course it's notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bachcell ( talk • contribs) 15:56, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
I, for one, am open to a renaming of the article. Possibilities:
Others are welcome to indicate whether they favor re-naming, and if so whether they approve of any of the above or have another thought as to the best new name.-- Epeefleche ( talk) 21:43, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Hmmmm. This is tough. I can’t think of a name that everyone is going to like. But I would propose to get the word “Somalia” into it somehow as that was a key element of what these two bone-cones were up to. I’m thinking something along the lines of Somalia-bound New Jersey jihad plotters. Greg L ( talk) 05:38, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
With that in mind, I am quite certain that very, very few people recall the name these two New Jersey guys were using between the two of them to refer to their plan. Besides, the article isn’t really about *their plan* (Operation Arabian Knight), it is about the men, their failed, plan, and the circumstances of their arrest and the events that will follow. I think any article name harking to just their plan is inappropriate. This point might be better seen if we were to call the article The jihad plan of the two New Jersey men who were arrested before they could go to Somalia and carry it out. Clearly, the articles is about much more than their plan. Greg L ( talk) 20:26, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
The section [ [1]] has a bum.
Regards, 203.214.44.199 ( talk) 11:06, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Al-Shabaab's beliefs are way out of the scope of this article and are better covered in the groups article. The flag is also out of date and unnecessary. To many concerns to list. Marcus Qwertyus 22:03, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Response to third opinion request: |
The 3O page advises, "Before making a request here, be sure that the issue has been thoroughly discussed on the article talk page. 3O is only for assistance in resolving disagreements that have come to a standstill." If you would like a third opinion, Marcus, I think it would help if first you did list your concerns, and then let Epeefleche respond to those concerns point-by-point. If there are then any issues that remain unresolved after you have both made good faith attempts to resolve them, I would be happy at that time to give my opinion on those issues. WikiDao ☯ (talk) 23:06, 19 October 2010 (UTC) |
Note: dispute seems to concern the content of this diff. WikiDao ☯ (talk) 23:06, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Operation Arabian Knight. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 06:23, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Operation Arabian Knight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.dailyrecord.com/article/20101018/UPDATES01/101018071/-1/UPDATES01/NJ-terror-suspects-working-on-plea-agreement{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.france24.com/en/20100606-two-men-charged-jihad-plot-against-americans-abroad{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-06-07/new-jersey-terrorism-suspects-detained-without-bail-update2-.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:29, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Operation Arabian Knight article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on June 8, 2010. The result of the discussion was keep. |
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This is international front page news (New York Times, of course it's notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bachcell ( talk • contribs) 15:56, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
I, for one, am open to a renaming of the article. Possibilities:
Others are welcome to indicate whether they favor re-naming, and if so whether they approve of any of the above or have another thought as to the best new name.-- Epeefleche ( talk) 21:43, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Hmmmm. This is tough. I can’t think of a name that everyone is going to like. But I would propose to get the word “Somalia” into it somehow as that was a key element of what these two bone-cones were up to. I’m thinking something along the lines of Somalia-bound New Jersey jihad plotters. Greg L ( talk) 05:38, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
With that in mind, I am quite certain that very, very few people recall the name these two New Jersey guys were using between the two of them to refer to their plan. Besides, the article isn’t really about *their plan* (Operation Arabian Knight), it is about the men, their failed, plan, and the circumstances of their arrest and the events that will follow. I think any article name harking to just their plan is inappropriate. This point might be better seen if we were to call the article The jihad plan of the two New Jersey men who were arrested before they could go to Somalia and carry it out. Clearly, the articles is about much more than their plan. Greg L ( talk) 20:26, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
The section [ [1]] has a bum.
Regards, 203.214.44.199 ( talk) 11:06, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Al-Shabaab's beliefs are way out of the scope of this article and are better covered in the groups article. The flag is also out of date and unnecessary. To many concerns to list. Marcus Qwertyus 22:03, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Response to third opinion request: |
The 3O page advises, "Before making a request here, be sure that the issue has been thoroughly discussed on the article talk page. 3O is only for assistance in resolving disagreements that have come to a standstill." If you would like a third opinion, Marcus, I think it would help if first you did list your concerns, and then let Epeefleche respond to those concerns point-by-point. If there are then any issues that remain unresolved after you have both made good faith attempts to resolve them, I would be happy at that time to give my opinion on those issues. WikiDao ☯ (talk) 23:06, 19 October 2010 (UTC) |
Note: dispute seems to concern the content of this diff. WikiDao ☯ (talk) 23:06, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Operation Arabian Knight. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 06:23, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Operation Arabian Knight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.dailyrecord.com/article/20101018/UPDATES01/101018071/-1/UPDATES01/NJ-terror-suspects-working-on-plea-agreement{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.france24.com/en/20100606-two-men-charged-jihad-plot-against-americans-abroad{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-06-07/new-jersey-terrorism-suspects-detained-without-bail-update2-.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:29, 4 September 2017 (UTC)