This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
OpenZFS has been recently started as a project, so it's still quite uncommon to find 2nd or 3rd party reviews, discussions etc. I've found three such sources, and will be adding them soon. Of course, all additions are more than welcome. -- Dsimic ( talk) 11:18, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
I added a new section about the differences between OpenZFS and the closed source ZFS, but that was deleted by the admin. I think there is a interest in knowing the differences between them? What are the feature set that differs? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.253.165.28 ( talk) 11:06, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Shaddim! As already noted in my edit summary, please don't get me wrong but you seem slightly confused. For example, Ubuntu (or any other Linux distribution) can't include OpenZFS simply because there's no OpenZFS as a software component; instead, OpenZFS is a movement, or an umbrella project, which serves to organize and put other real projects (that is, actual open-source ZFS implementations) on the same page.
Furthermore, the whole thing with Ubuntu and ZFS is currently more of a legal-related controversy than something oriented toward adding new value to the Linux ecosystem as a whole. As such, it doesn't provide much encyclopedic value and shouldn't be a significant part of the article until the whole thing clears out. Maybe mentioning it briefly would fit well, I'll see to introduce that into the OpenZFS § History section a bit later. That's my opinion. — Dsimic ( talk | contribs) 13:31, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Thank you!
FT2 ( Talk | email) 19:51, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Anyone interested please see Talk:Oracle ZFS#Requested move 18 May 2020 where a new option presented may affect the OpenZFS article. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 11:38, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base. Pawel Jakub Dawidek pjd at FreeBSD.org Fri Apr 6 02:58:34 UTC 2007 Previous message: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v Next message: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base. Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] Hi.
I'm happy to inform that the ZFS file system is now part of the FreeBSD operating system. ZFS is available in the HEAD branch and will be available in FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE as an experimental feature.
Commit log:
Please welcome ZFS - The last word in file systems. ZFS file system was ported from OpenSolaris operating system. The code in under CDDL license. I'd like to thank all SUN developers that created this great piece of software. Supported by: Wheel LTD ( http://www.wheel.pl/) Supported by: The FreeBSD Foundation ( http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/) Supported by: Sentex ( http://www.sentex.net/)
73.89.21.151 ( talk) 03:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Both lemmas redirect to "OpenZFS#Distributions" which no longer exist. That's pretty bad, since "ZFS on Linux" attracted a lot of development. AFAIR there were two major implemenations: kernel module and as FUSE. User:ScotXW t@lk 09:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
OpenZFS has been recently started as a project, so it's still quite uncommon to find 2nd or 3rd party reviews, discussions etc. I've found three such sources, and will be adding them soon. Of course, all additions are more than welcome. -- Dsimic ( talk) 11:18, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
I added a new section about the differences between OpenZFS and the closed source ZFS, but that was deleted by the admin. I think there is a interest in knowing the differences between them? What are the feature set that differs? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.253.165.28 ( talk) 11:06, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Shaddim! As already noted in my edit summary, please don't get me wrong but you seem slightly confused. For example, Ubuntu (or any other Linux distribution) can't include OpenZFS simply because there's no OpenZFS as a software component; instead, OpenZFS is a movement, or an umbrella project, which serves to organize and put other real projects (that is, actual open-source ZFS implementations) on the same page.
Furthermore, the whole thing with Ubuntu and ZFS is currently more of a legal-related controversy than something oriented toward adding new value to the Linux ecosystem as a whole. As such, it doesn't provide much encyclopedic value and shouldn't be a significant part of the article until the whole thing clears out. Maybe mentioning it briefly would fit well, I'll see to introduce that into the OpenZFS § History section a bit later. That's my opinion. — Dsimic ( talk | contribs) 13:31, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Thank you!
FT2 ( Talk | email) 19:51, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Anyone interested please see Talk:Oracle ZFS#Requested move 18 May 2020 where a new option presented may affect the OpenZFS article. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 11:38, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base. Pawel Jakub Dawidek pjd at FreeBSD.org Fri Apr 6 02:58:34 UTC 2007 Previous message: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v Next message: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base. Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] Hi.
I'm happy to inform that the ZFS file system is now part of the FreeBSD operating system. ZFS is available in the HEAD branch and will be available in FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE as an experimental feature.
Commit log:
Please welcome ZFS - The last word in file systems. ZFS file system was ported from OpenSolaris operating system. The code in under CDDL license. I'd like to thank all SUN developers that created this great piece of software. Supported by: Wheel LTD ( http://www.wheel.pl/) Supported by: The FreeBSD Foundation ( http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/) Supported by: Sentex ( http://www.sentex.net/)
73.89.21.151 ( talk) 03:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Both lemmas redirect to "OpenZFS#Distributions" which no longer exist. That's pretty bad, since "ZFS on Linux" attracted a lot of development. AFAIR there were two major implemenations: kernel module and as FUSE. User:ScotXW t@lk 09:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)