![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on November 8, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on October 24, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This software is quite useful, and is probably as notable as other open source project management software. I would prefer to complete the article, rather than delete it. Brianegge 22:25, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Agreed, this is useful software. The article should be tidied up, especially consider the popularity of this software. ( Rupertheathen —Preceding comment was added at 19:55, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
The following information needs to be added to the article to make it clear that it is notable:
* Newspaper articles; * Books; * User Guides; * TV Documentaries; * Magazine Reviews;
* Multiple non-trivial articles; * Reliable published works: o newspaper and magazine articles; o books; o television documentaries; o websites; o published reports by consumer watchdog organizations; * Awards it has won; * Distribution channels;
jonathon 22:03, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on November 8, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on October 24, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This software is quite useful, and is probably as notable as other open source project management software. I would prefer to complete the article, rather than delete it. Brianegge 22:25, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Agreed, this is useful software. The article should be tidied up, especially consider the popularity of this software. ( Rupertheathen —Preceding comment was added at 19:55, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
The following information needs to be added to the article to make it clear that it is notable:
* Newspaper articles; * Books; * User Guides; * TV Documentaries; * Magazine Reviews;
* Multiple non-trivial articles; * Reliable published works: o newspaper and magazine articles; o books; o television documentaries; o websites; o published reports by consumer watchdog organizations; * Awards it has won; * Distribution channels;
jonathon 22:03, 12 November 2007 (UTC)