![]() | Ontario Highway 427 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | Ontario Highway 427 is part of the 400-series highways series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated A-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Would the 427 by being Ontario's second busiest highway (~320,000 AADT at Burnhamthorpe Rd), de facto be Canada's second busiest highway? Unless some Montreal/Calgary/Vancouver highway has more.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: MuZemike ( talk · contribs) 22:51, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Only went through roughly half the prose, but New Year's is getting in the way at the moment. Hopefully I will finish it as fast as I can. -- MuZemike 22:51, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
On hold – Finally finished after putting it off for a while; my apologies for not getting to it earlier. Aside from a couple of prose issues and some MoS issues (I already saw that you removed one image, and I moved another one to another section, so that is better. I'll give the standard week from today for corrections to be made, which there aren't many. -- MuZemike 23:46, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Regarding this external link, which Floydian has been adding and I've been removing: Lost Road: Indian Line Road
What to do when the guidelines are contradictory? As Floydian has pointed out, the guidelines say that "links to be considered" include sites that are not reliable sources. [1] But as I've pointed out, the guidelines also say that "one should generally avoid ... links to ... discussion forums." [2] To me, "consider" is weaker than "avoid," and thus we should prefer the second guideline over the first. Similarly, "no" is stronger than "maybe" (the first guideline is abbreviated as WP:ELMAYBE and the second is shortened to WP:NO). Can anyone suggest a way of resolving the contradiction? 99.224.54.167 ( talk) 21:17, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
Any idea when or why it was decided to follow indian line instead of widening and following highway 27?
Also curious about the history of the 401,427,27 interchange -- now seems to be a major bottleneck on the 401 Feldercarb ( talk) 02:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Ontario Highway 427. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 09:46, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ontario Highway 427. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.427corridor.com/427corridor/pdf/427%20Transportation%20Corridor%20EA%20Report%20FINAL%20Jan%2029%202010%20%28FULL%20MAIN%20REPORT%29.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:17, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Same beef with the use of this photo on the Highway 409 article. The focus on this shot is more on the GTAA-built ramps rather than the MTO's 427-409 interchange, hence the caption has been changed to more accurately reflect this.
This picture shows the collector-express system of Highway 427 better than any other existing photo in the article, I'm using it in a manner similar to the one in the Highway 401 page.[Ontario_Highway_401#/media/File:King's_Highway_401_-_Ontario_(4118738546).jpg].
This photo doesn't really show a good shot of the collector-express system as one can barely see the southbound collectors, but if it is to be kept in the article, then describe it more accurately. FobTown ( talk) 03:43, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Wouldn't "lanes" work better than "carriageways" as a substitute here? Aloha27 talk 05:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() | Ontario Highway 427 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | Ontario Highway 427 is part of the 400-series highways series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated A-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Would the 427 by being Ontario's second busiest highway (~320,000 AADT at Burnhamthorpe Rd), de facto be Canada's second busiest highway? Unless some Montreal/Calgary/Vancouver highway has more.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: MuZemike ( talk · contribs) 22:51, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Only went through roughly half the prose, but New Year's is getting in the way at the moment. Hopefully I will finish it as fast as I can. -- MuZemike 22:51, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
On hold – Finally finished after putting it off for a while; my apologies for not getting to it earlier. Aside from a couple of prose issues and some MoS issues (I already saw that you removed one image, and I moved another one to another section, so that is better. I'll give the standard week from today for corrections to be made, which there aren't many. -- MuZemike 23:46, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Regarding this external link, which Floydian has been adding and I've been removing: Lost Road: Indian Line Road
What to do when the guidelines are contradictory? As Floydian has pointed out, the guidelines say that "links to be considered" include sites that are not reliable sources. [1] But as I've pointed out, the guidelines also say that "one should generally avoid ... links to ... discussion forums." [2] To me, "consider" is weaker than "avoid," and thus we should prefer the second guideline over the first. Similarly, "no" is stronger than "maybe" (the first guideline is abbreviated as WP:ELMAYBE and the second is shortened to WP:NO). Can anyone suggest a way of resolving the contradiction? 99.224.54.167 ( talk) 21:17, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
Any idea when or why it was decided to follow indian line instead of widening and following highway 27?
Also curious about the history of the 401,427,27 interchange -- now seems to be a major bottleneck on the 401 Feldercarb ( talk) 02:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Ontario Highway 427. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 09:46, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ontario Highway 427. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.427corridor.com/427corridor/pdf/427%20Transportation%20Corridor%20EA%20Report%20FINAL%20Jan%2029%202010%20%28FULL%20MAIN%20REPORT%29.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:17, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Same beef with the use of this photo on the Highway 409 article. The focus on this shot is more on the GTAA-built ramps rather than the MTO's 427-409 interchange, hence the caption has been changed to more accurately reflect this.
This picture shows the collector-express system of Highway 427 better than any other existing photo in the article, I'm using it in a manner similar to the one in the Highway 401 page.[Ontario_Highway_401#/media/File:King's_Highway_401_-_Ontario_(4118738546).jpg].
This photo doesn't really show a good shot of the collector-express system as one can barely see the southbound collectors, but if it is to be kept in the article, then describe it more accurately. FobTown ( talk) 03:43, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Wouldn't "lanes" work better than "carriageways" as a substitute here? Aloha27 talk 05:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)