![]() | Ontario Highway 12 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
http://www.ourroots.ca/e/page.aspx?id=589960 pg 88 - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 07:24, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
http://books.google.ca/books?id=50mkcVzllHoC&q=Whitby+to+Lindsay+Highway&dq=Whitby+to+Lindsay+Highway&hl=en&ei=ohSeTLGWJ4L78Abx2cnLDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAA - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 06:48, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: InTheAM ( talk · contribs) 03:14, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Great article. Only a few minor things need fixed.
The article stays on topic and covers the subject in plenty of detail.
Article is neutral.
Article is stable.
All images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content.
I'll put this on hold until these issues are fixed. Let me know if you have questions or if I could help. InThe AM 20:05, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() | Ontario Highway 12 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
http://www.ourroots.ca/e/page.aspx?id=589960 pg 88 - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 07:24, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
http://books.google.ca/books?id=50mkcVzllHoC&q=Whitby+to+Lindsay+Highway&dq=Whitby+to+Lindsay+Highway&hl=en&ei=ohSeTLGWJ4L78Abx2cnLDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAA - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 06:48, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: InTheAM ( talk · contribs) 03:14, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Great article. Only a few minor things need fixed.
The article stays on topic and covers the subject in plenty of detail.
Article is neutral.
Article is stable.
All images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content.
I'll put this on hold until these issues are fixed. Let me know if you have questions or if I could help. InThe AM 20:05, 1 December 2011 (UTC)