The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA review (see
here for what the criteria are, and
here for what they are not)
At a cursory glance, citations seem regular and to back up facts, there aren't any banners or noteworthy inline tags. The article contains a lot of detail about the topic to which it pertains and appears to provide a comprehensive overview.
It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
The prose is concise, grammar and spelling are to a high standard besides a few superficial errors I have corrected, and the article is overall easy-to-read and understandable.
This article does not cover fiction, the lead section is perhaps a bit long but absolutely passable, word choice is acceptable. Lists and layout are also appropriate.
The vast majority of sources listed are indisputably reliable. There are some links to Google Maps, which are perhaps not ideal by themselves, but are consistent in their information with other sources. There was one dead source I came across, but I have linked in an archive.
All media adds to the article and uses informative, concise descriptions.
Overall:
Pass/fail:
(Criteria marked are unassessed)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA review (see
here for what the criteria are, and
here for what they are not)
At a cursory glance, citations seem regular and to back up facts, there aren't any banners or noteworthy inline tags. The article contains a lot of detail about the topic to which it pertains and appears to provide a comprehensive overview.
It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
The prose is concise, grammar and spelling are to a high standard besides a few superficial errors I have corrected, and the article is overall easy-to-read and understandable.
This article does not cover fiction, the lead section is perhaps a bit long but absolutely passable, word choice is acceptable. Lists and layout are also appropriate.
The vast majority of sources listed are indisputably reliable. There are some links to Google Maps, which are perhaps not ideal by themselves, but are consistent in their information with other sources. There was one dead source I came across, but I have linked in an archive.
All media adds to the article and uses informative, concise descriptions.
Overall:
Pass/fail:
(Criteria marked are unassessed)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.