![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Result was of proposal to merge Online shopping rewards into loyalty program was inconclusive, default to keep separate without prejudice to reopening discussion, or simply being bold and doing the merger per WP:Merge. nb. there also appears to have been discussion at Talk:Loyalty_program#merge suggestions however this significantly more detailed discussion trumps the discussion on that page. -- Debate 木 13:42, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Loyalty program cashback seems redundant with this article, and should merged into here. -- MichaelZimmer ( talk) 02:37, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
I think this page should be merged into Reward website. Cashback websites has similar content but I firmly believe that it deserves an article on its own as a distinct type of Reward Website. 'Reward Website' could mean anything from paid to complete surveys down to these cheap, badly made paid-to-click, paid-to-read, paid-to-view sites, while cashback websites can be said to have more in common with the type of cashback and rewards you can get from some credit cards - more shopping related. Identz 21:37, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm having trouble understanding the distinction you are making between reward website and cashback website. I actually agree with the suggestion that this should be merged with loyalty program, which in turn should probably be renamed reward scheme or similar. I agree that some of the content should maybe be moved to reward website, at the same time including information about the existing loyalty card programs which, over the past few years, have moved into the reward website market. Also on the reward website page, emphasis should be put on the many different kinds of reward sites like those you have mentioned. Waindigo 22:04, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
I've just removed references to Quidco and Rpoints. Naming specific sites just invites spam as well as legitimate high-ranking cashback sites who think they have equal right to be included trying to add themselve. I know because I spent months removing spam from the main Cashback website article until someone had the good sense just to wipe all mention to specific sites. I was moved to do this when some users recently put several mentions to Ipoints in the Cashback Website section(Iponts isn't even a cashback website because it returns rewards rather than actual cash). I really don't want to be spending time reverting when any of the 85+ cashback sites want to add themselves to the article like I was doing previously Identz ( talk) 01:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Result was of proposal to merge Online shopping rewards into loyalty program was inconclusive, default to keep separate without prejudice to reopening discussion, or simply being bold and doing the merger per WP:Merge. nb. there also appears to have been discussion at Talk:Loyalty_program#merge suggestions however this significantly more detailed discussion trumps the discussion on that page. -- Debate 木 13:42, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Loyalty program cashback seems redundant with this article, and should merged into here. -- MichaelZimmer ( talk) 02:37, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
I think this page should be merged into Reward website. Cashback websites has similar content but I firmly believe that it deserves an article on its own as a distinct type of Reward Website. 'Reward Website' could mean anything from paid to complete surveys down to these cheap, badly made paid-to-click, paid-to-read, paid-to-view sites, while cashback websites can be said to have more in common with the type of cashback and rewards you can get from some credit cards - more shopping related. Identz 21:37, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm having trouble understanding the distinction you are making between reward website and cashback website. I actually agree with the suggestion that this should be merged with loyalty program, which in turn should probably be renamed reward scheme or similar. I agree that some of the content should maybe be moved to reward website, at the same time including information about the existing loyalty card programs which, over the past few years, have moved into the reward website market. Also on the reward website page, emphasis should be put on the many different kinds of reward sites like those you have mentioned. Waindigo 22:04, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
I've just removed references to Quidco and Rpoints. Naming specific sites just invites spam as well as legitimate high-ranking cashback sites who think they have equal right to be included trying to add themselve. I know because I spent months removing spam from the main Cashback website article until someone had the good sense just to wipe all mention to specific sites. I was moved to do this when some users recently put several mentions to Ipoints in the Cashback Website section(Iponts isn't even a cashback website because it returns rewards rather than actual cash). I really don't want to be spending time reverting when any of the 85+ cashback sites want to add themselves to the article like I was doing previously Identz ( talk) 01:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)