The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
The lead covers the information that is found in the article it is three paragraphs in length. The prose throughout is succinct and the words used are understandable by a general audience. I see conversion templates for measurements. I think it may be useful to have conversion templates for money but since the building was developed in the 1980s a conversion may not be very impressive. I have reviewed your work before and you are an impressive and thorough editor.
Lightburst (
talk)
22:27, 18 August 2023 (UTC)reply
@
Lightburst, I've added footnotes for the inflated figures to all pre-2000 monetary values. Although the US dollar has a low inflation rate, the value of the dollar has still declined by 80 percent compared to when the project was first proposed (e.g. $1 in 1976 would be worth $5 today). –
Epicgenius (
talk)
16:24, 19 August 2023 (UTC)reply
@
Epicgenius: Thanks. I am sure it is not a GA requirement but I appreciate conversions as a reader. I hope to continue the review today and tomorrow. It is a pleasure to read content which was created by such a prolific, expert Wikipedian.
Lightburst (
talk)
16:29, 19 August 2023 (UTC)reply
B.
Reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
Reference 48 is what looks like a
non-rs forum. Can we find a better source?
Done The source says "His public commissions included the fountain sculptures at World Wide Plaza in Manhattan", but I've added another source specifically linking Simon to the fountain.
Epicgenius (
talk)
23:22, 18 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The detail which has been presented is needed, it is a credit to the nominator: if only all of Wikipedia could have articles which are written so well... It is truly a pleasure to see an article written with such precision.
Lightburst (
talk)
18:42, 19 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
The lead covers the information that is found in the article it is three paragraphs in length. The prose throughout is succinct and the words used are understandable by a general audience. I see conversion templates for measurements. I think it may be useful to have conversion templates for money but since the building was developed in the 1980s a conversion may not be very impressive. I have reviewed your work before and you are an impressive and thorough editor.
Lightburst (
talk)
22:27, 18 August 2023 (UTC)reply
@
Lightburst, I've added footnotes for the inflated figures to all pre-2000 monetary values. Although the US dollar has a low inflation rate, the value of the dollar has still declined by 80 percent compared to when the project was first proposed (e.g. $1 in 1976 would be worth $5 today). –
Epicgenius (
talk)
16:24, 19 August 2023 (UTC)reply
@
Epicgenius: Thanks. I am sure it is not a GA requirement but I appreciate conversions as a reader. I hope to continue the review today and tomorrow. It is a pleasure to read content which was created by such a prolific, expert Wikipedian.
Lightburst (
talk)
16:29, 19 August 2023 (UTC)reply
B.
Reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
Reference 48 is what looks like a
non-rs forum. Can we find a better source?
Done The source says "His public commissions included the fountain sculptures at World Wide Plaza in Manhattan", but I've added another source specifically linking Simon to the fountain.
Epicgenius (
talk)
23:22, 18 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The detail which has been presented is needed, it is a credit to the nominator: if only all of Wikipedia could have articles which are written so well... It is truly a pleasure to see an article written with such precision.
Lightburst (
talk)
18:42, 19 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.