GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Numbermaniac ( talk · contribs) 01:30, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
It looks like a good article to me, good info, except that some references are broken, specifically references 42-44. Several other references also have problems such as dead links, missing titles, page needed, etc.
Overall, the article's content is brilliant, and once the references are properly fixed, I believe this article can be listed as Good-Article Status.
Numbermaniac
- T
- C
02:52, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Note: I have fixed some citation errors, where a "url=" parameter was needed in the presence of "archiveurl=" parameter. smtchahal talk 04:40, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Generally, editors are given 7 days to fix the article for GA status. However, I do like this article, hence I am giving editors 14 days to fix all necessary issues with the article. I may extend the time later, but don't count on it. Editors now have until 2 June to address all issues, before a final reassessment of the article. -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 02:37, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
7 days remaining. -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 00:47, 26 May 2013 (UTC) Current references with errors:
If these are fixed, I can do a final reassessment and lift this to GA-status. -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 00:50, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
The article is now a GA! Yay! -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 09:20, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Numbermaniac ( talk · contribs) 01:30, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
It looks like a good article to me, good info, except that some references are broken, specifically references 42-44. Several other references also have problems such as dead links, missing titles, page needed, etc.
Overall, the article's content is brilliant, and once the references are properly fixed, I believe this article can be listed as Good-Article Status.
Numbermaniac
- T
- C
02:52, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Note: I have fixed some citation errors, where a "url=" parameter was needed in the presence of "archiveurl=" parameter. smtchahal talk 04:40, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Generally, editors are given 7 days to fix the article for GA status. However, I do like this article, hence I am giving editors 14 days to fix all necessary issues with the article. I may extend the time later, but don't count on it. Editors now have until 2 June to address all issues, before a final reassessment of the article. -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 02:37, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
7 days remaining. -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 00:47, 26 May 2013 (UTC) Current references with errors:
If these are fixed, I can do a final reassessment and lift this to GA-status. -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 00:50, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
The article is now a GA! Yay! -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 09:20, 28 May 2013 (UTC)