![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 27 November 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is there any reason given why this page should be deleted? It's well sourced, as far as I can see, and might be extended as well, but deleting this page seems like glossing over an important aspect of JH's time as PM. -- Lord Chao ( talk) 10:07, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
The Howard quote:"I do believe that if it is - in the eyes of some in the community...etc etc, is part of One Australia, as shown in references. Someone removed it, saying it's not referenced, so I restored it again. Lester 11:23, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Most of the references in this article do not even mention the "One Australia policy". This entire article a piece of synthesis. It reads like someone cut out a bunch of newspaper clippings and tried to attribute it to a policy called "One Australia policy". Only citations that actually mention the One Australia policy should be included. Prester John -( Talk to the Hand) 16:25, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
I removed a reference to an opinion piece in a Canadian paper, and the following comments are copied from my talk page discussing the removal. -- rakkar ( talk) 01:04, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 27 November 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is there any reason given why this page should be deleted? It's well sourced, as far as I can see, and might be extended as well, but deleting this page seems like glossing over an important aspect of JH's time as PM. -- Lord Chao ( talk) 10:07, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
The Howard quote:"I do believe that if it is - in the eyes of some in the community...etc etc, is part of One Australia, as shown in references. Someone removed it, saying it's not referenced, so I restored it again. Lester 11:23, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Most of the references in this article do not even mention the "One Australia policy". This entire article a piece of synthesis. It reads like someone cut out a bunch of newspaper clippings and tried to attribute it to a policy called "One Australia policy". Only citations that actually mention the One Australia policy should be included. Prester John -( Talk to the Hand) 16:25, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
I removed a reference to an opinion piece in a Canadian paper, and the following comments are copied from my talk page discussing the removal. -- rakkar ( talk) 01:04, 29 April 2008 (UTC)