![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by Creffett ( talk · contribs) on 9 February 2020. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
The article (as of now) states what the initiative is, who started it, and what its goals are. Those are statements of fact. It doesn't say it's "good" or "better than" something else. Longitude2 ( talk) 14:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
This is an open specification not a single vendor solution. Additional references have been added and cite multiple sources and companies. This is fairly new, additional sources and industry engagement will become available as the project evolves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoBuck76 ( talk • contribs) 17:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
240F:60:1125:1:3151:7C6:CC82:DD2B ( talk) 13:13, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I tried to keep my edits as factual and free from bias as possible. Can you advise me on how to improve it so that the maintenance header can be removed? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kgmoffat ( talk • contribs) 16:50, 8 October 2021 (UTC) Kgmoffat ( talk) 15:17, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
This sentence "University of Heidelberg has developed a SYCL/DPC++ implementation for both AMD and Nvidia GPUs" implies that SYCL is somehow a subset of DPC++. The reference is also not appropriate. It should point to the developer page ( https://github.com/OpenSYCL/OpenSYCL) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:708:10:4008:B:0:0:C ( talk) 08:43, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
@ 0xDeadbeef: Can you help me to understand this edit? I think that putting <ref></ref> around the [...] would have made it into an acceptable link. Thank you in advance! Dimawik ( talk) 21:10, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by Creffett ( talk · contribs) on 9 February 2020. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
The article (as of now) states what the initiative is, who started it, and what its goals are. Those are statements of fact. It doesn't say it's "good" or "better than" something else. Longitude2 ( talk) 14:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
This is an open specification not a single vendor solution. Additional references have been added and cite multiple sources and companies. This is fairly new, additional sources and industry engagement will become available as the project evolves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoBuck76 ( talk • contribs) 17:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
240F:60:1125:1:3151:7C6:CC82:DD2B ( talk) 13:13, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I tried to keep my edits as factual and free from bias as possible. Can you advise me on how to improve it so that the maintenance header can be removed? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kgmoffat ( talk • contribs) 16:50, 8 October 2021 (UTC) Kgmoffat ( talk) 15:17, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
This sentence "University of Heidelberg has developed a SYCL/DPC++ implementation for both AMD and Nvidia GPUs" implies that SYCL is somehow a subset of DPC++. The reference is also not appropriate. It should point to the developer page ( https://github.com/OpenSYCL/OpenSYCL) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:708:10:4008:B:0:0:C ( talk) 08:43, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
@ 0xDeadbeef: Can you help me to understand this edit? I think that putting <ref></ref> around the [...] would have made it into an acceptable link. Thank you in advance! Dimawik ( talk) 21:10, 10 January 2024 (UTC)