This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Culture / South Pacific / British / Canadian / European / North America / United States Start‑class This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Start This redirect does not require a rating on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force British military history task force Canadian military history task force European military history task force North American military history task force United States military history task force

In Sweden, most ranks have stars. In Japan during WW2, even privaes, coporals and sergeans. -- Malin Randstrom ( talk) 08:34, 11 September 2008 (UTC) reply

Fair enough, but I don't think that will have much impact (if any) on current usage and understanding that a "star rank" refers to generals and admirals. Yes, Sweden may use stars, but are those ranks referred to as "star ranks"? And if so, what do you propose? Cheers, Pdfpdf ( talk) 11:02, 11 September 2008 (UTC) reply

This article appears to contain an error common to many articles, see Talk:Five-star rank#Other affected articles and the discussion that immediately precedes it. Andrewa ( talk) 01:14, 17 July 2014 (UTC) reply