![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The image File:Olympiakos4.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 09:24, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
With all due respect Tony1, I don't think we should spend more time on self-evident, obvious things like those. By the way, I wish you Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. Take care. Gtrbolivar ( talk) 23:25, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
You are combative and rude.
First, we don't put color decorations in infoboxes unless there's a particular value-add. There isn't one in simply shoving in squares filled with red and white.
"Do I really need to explain this?" No you don't. It's a fault with the script which we'll see to fixing. You achieve nothing with your sarcasm but to piss off other editors.
No, we don't link to widely known geographical/political entities. Go read the guidelines.
Yes, there IS a guideline against useless linking of years, dates, and other chronological items. You shouldn't be editing en.WP without having acquainted yourself with basic guidelines.
"With all due respect"—don't be sarcastic. And I don't wish you your christian commercial celebration. Tony (talk) 13:08, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
:"Legal issue" meaning I'll take him to ANI, you idiot.Jytdog ( talk) 21:54, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
I see absolutely no reason to pipe a link to [[sports club|multi-sports club]]. There is zero value added in that link as the vast majority of readers will know what a sports club is; piping to multi-sports club violates
WP:EGG, in my view. To say that such links exist across wikipedia is saying nothing more than
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. I would however apologise the glitch in the script that caused the spurious removal of the text. That glitch has now been corrected. By the same token, the colour boxes also serve little purpose except to speckle articles with splodges of colour. Who doesn't know the colour red and the colour white?
--
Ohc
¡digame!
16:31, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The image File:Olympiakos4.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 09:24, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
With all due respect Tony1, I don't think we should spend more time on self-evident, obvious things like those. By the way, I wish you Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. Take care. Gtrbolivar ( talk) 23:25, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
You are combative and rude.
First, we don't put color decorations in infoboxes unless there's a particular value-add. There isn't one in simply shoving in squares filled with red and white.
"Do I really need to explain this?" No you don't. It's a fault with the script which we'll see to fixing. You achieve nothing with your sarcasm but to piss off other editors.
No, we don't link to widely known geographical/political entities. Go read the guidelines.
Yes, there IS a guideline against useless linking of years, dates, and other chronological items. You shouldn't be editing en.WP without having acquainted yourself with basic guidelines.
"With all due respect"—don't be sarcastic. And I don't wish you your christian commercial celebration. Tony (talk) 13:08, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
:"Legal issue" meaning I'll take him to ANI, you idiot.Jytdog ( talk) 21:54, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
I see absolutely no reason to pipe a link to [[sports club|multi-sports club]]. There is zero value added in that link as the vast majority of readers will know what a sports club is; piping to multi-sports club violates
WP:EGG, in my view. To say that such links exist across wikipedia is saying nothing more than
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. I would however apologise the glitch in the script that caused the spurious removal of the text. That glitch has now been corrected. By the same token, the colour boxes also serve little purpose except to speckle articles with splodges of colour. Who doesn't know the colour red and the colour white?
--
Ohc
¡digame!
16:31, 28 December 2017 (UTC)