GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Wizardman ( talk · contribs) 01:54, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
I'll review this article shortly.
Wizardman
01:54, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
I'll give this a full review tomorrow, sorry I've been slow. First off though, can there are a few bare URLs that are just titles; add publishers and authors/dates if applicable. Wizardman 03:06, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Here are the issues I found:
On the surface, it looks like a nice article. However, as I got further along it felt less like reading an encyclopedic account of Kuhn and more like a journalism piece. That is something that I don't think could be realistically addressed in a short time, especially since I think it needs an extra set of eyes. I'll put it on hold for now, but honestly I'd rather closed this as a fail and have you work with someone to get it up to snuff at your own pace. Wizardman 00:38, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
I'll re-look over it this weekend, to be honest I forgot to do it before. On a skim though, I'm not sure why the early life section has all those subsections now, it just feels awkward and I think it was fine how it was earlier. Wizardman 05:34, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Wizardman ( talk · contribs) 01:54, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
I'll review this article shortly.
Wizardman
01:54, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
I'll give this a full review tomorrow, sorry I've been slow. First off though, can there are a few bare URLs that are just titles; add publishers and authors/dates if applicable. Wizardman 03:06, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Here are the issues I found:
On the surface, it looks like a nice article. However, as I got further along it felt less like reading an encyclopedic account of Kuhn and more like a journalism piece. That is something that I don't think could be realistically addressed in a short time, especially since I think it needs an extra set of eyes. I'll put it on hold for now, but honestly I'd rather closed this as a fail and have you work with someone to get it up to snuff at your own pace. Wizardman 00:38, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
I'll re-look over it this weekend, to be honest I forgot to do it before. On a skim though, I'm not sure why the early life section has all those subsections now, it just feels awkward and I think it was fine how it was earlier. Wizardman 05:34, 7 February 2015 (UTC)