Old National Library Building has been listed as one of the
Art and architecture good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 12, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from Old National Library Building appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 30 June 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on March 31, 2024. |
Large parts of this article do not have an encyclopedic tone. Some examples:
These sound like their coming from a memorial for the building.-- Carabinieri 15:09, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Per WP:FOOTNOTE: "Avoid using Ibid or similar abbreviations in footnotes. Other editors who add new references to the article may not take the time to correct Ibid references broken by their addition. Furthermore, not all readers are familiar with the meaning of the term. If a reference is reused in more than one footnote, it is preferable to use the format "Smith, Short Title, 182" rather than "Ibid, 182", so as to avoid these problems, or use named references if appropriate." – Chacor 09:44, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Yes, this has been bugging me too. Anyway, I've fixed it. I actually prefer citing the whole work instead of page numbers, and combining the citations. If there is consensus I will make the change that way. -- Rifleman 82 11:49, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Acalycine ( talk · contribs) 04:22, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Old National Library Building has been listed as one of the
Art and architecture good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 12, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from Old National Library Building appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 30 June 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on March 31, 2024. |
Large parts of this article do not have an encyclopedic tone. Some examples:
These sound like their coming from a memorial for the building.-- Carabinieri 15:09, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Per WP:FOOTNOTE: "Avoid using Ibid or similar abbreviations in footnotes. Other editors who add new references to the article may not take the time to correct Ibid references broken by their addition. Furthermore, not all readers are familiar with the meaning of the term. If a reference is reused in more than one footnote, it is preferable to use the format "Smith, Short Title, 182" rather than "Ibid, 182", so as to avoid these problems, or use named references if appropriate." – Chacor 09:44, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Yes, this has been bugging me too. Anyway, I've fixed it. I actually prefer citing the whole work instead of page numbers, and combining the citations. If there is consensus I will make the change that way. -- Rifleman 82 11:49, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Acalycine ( talk · contribs) 04:22, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria