Old Jock has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
October 11, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the dog
Old Jock, born 1859, is considered to be one of the founding sires of the modern
Fox Terrier? |
I've added details of the only two shows which mention Old Jock specifically. If anyone can find any further details, please post them here with the locations for citations as I'd like to put this up as a Good Article shortly as I doubt any major information is out there that isn't already detailed. Miyagawa (talk) 22:42, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: – Grondemar 21:23, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
Working I will aim to complete the review in the next few days. – Grondemar 21:23, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
This article is short but is very close to meeting the good article criteria. I made some copyedits that I believe improved the prose. I have the following concerns that will need to be addressed before the good article nomination can be passed:
Old Jock has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
October 11, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the dog
Old Jock, born 1859, is considered to be one of the founding sires of the modern
Fox Terrier? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
I've added details of the only two shows which mention Old Jock specifically. If anyone can find any further details, please post them here with the locations for citations as I'd like to put this up as a Good Article shortly as I doubt any major information is out there that isn't already detailed. Miyagawa (talk) 22:42, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: – Grondemar 21:23, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
Working I will aim to complete the review in the next few days. – Grondemar 21:23, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
This article is short but is very close to meeting the good article criteria. I made some copyedits that I believe improved the prose. I have the following concerns that will need to be addressed before the good article nomination can be passed: